Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,540 posts)
43. Well then, given the clearer perspective on our "philosophical" differences, may I suggest...
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:40 PM
Mar 2016

...a possibly "bridging" book, to which I referred earlier in this exchange, Frank Tipler's and John Barrow's The Cosmological Anthropic Principle." Like your arguments, it has too much "meta" in the physics for my taste, but both authors are, in fact, physicists nonetheless. If I recall correctly - I read it many years ago, and for a brief while took it quite seriously - there is a long riff on causality and "first causes."

I regard the book as a kind of useful mythology, in the sense that all myths have some utility, either for good or for bad. It's an argument that the purpose of the universe is to be seen, as opposed to the alternate argument that the universe has no purpose whatsoever, but merely is. In the latter case, it's not clear that causality can even be discussed, but that's another matter.

I feel, in a small way, I have seen. Now, feeling my mortality, I realize what a blessing that has been.

As my life draws towards its inevitable close, I remark that I have struggled my whole life with a sense of spirituality. I was raised in a family of devout Christians - positive Christianity I might add - and went on from there, with all kinds of visions of what the "ultimate" might be.

I suppose that it the end, I only have to remark that seeing the world in a way that proceeds almost exclusively through my scientific knowledge, I can only remark that it has been a remarkable privilege to have lived at all, to be something which is, a being who sees. I don't know about first causes, and I am quite uninterested in the broadest sense in epistemology for and of itself, but I will say this: Unlike many less fortunate people, it was my phenomenal luck, if not my noumenal luck, finally, after much struggle, to understand that life is insanely beautiful.

My interest in nuclear energy, my forceful advocacy for it, is very much involved with my desire that other human beings, some human beings, as many as is possible in our too often tragic world, will have the pleasure of seeing the world, to stare into it and be struck with ineffable wonder. This may be more prosaic than a full scale philosophical adventure into first causes and the like, but it's the best I do for spirituality.

I have much enjoyed disagreeing with you. Thanx.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oligarchy capitalism is killing our two most valuable resources: the planet and the people on it. nt JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #1
WWII and the Cold War were fought to decide whose system would get to wreck the planet. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #4
Once humans are extinct, the planet will recover. I wonder how many times humans have done this? JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #9
dude, this is the first time it is the fault of humans Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #16
The biosphere is coming to an end. Earth will be out of the habitable zone in about 800 million DhhD Mar 2016 #45
a few incremental tweaks around the edges should do the trick tk2kewl Mar 2016 #2
Just need to build on the ACA / FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #6
Fund Planned Parenthood pscot Mar 2016 #21
But but EEEvil Guverment Regulations are Killing Jobs! n/t n2doc Mar 2016 #3
I fully agree Dragonfli Mar 2016 #5
Done! And thanks for asking! nt GliderGuider Mar 2016 #8
Thank YOU! people need to understand we are actually facing extermination and neo-liberalism Dragonfli Mar 2016 #11
Yes, I know about it. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #12
"Oh, we won't go extinct. Our big brains will save us." CrispyQ Mar 2016 #13
This world has witnessed and endured several extinction level events, planets do not care about Dragonfli Mar 2016 #15
Based on our experiences with Biosphere I and II GliderGuider Mar 2016 #17
Thanks for the input, I instinctively doubted we could accomplish it successfully, but with what you Dragonfli Mar 2016 #18
I knew a woman who crewed the second Biosphere II mission GliderGuider Mar 2016 #19
Wasn't one of the main problems the concrete taking up oxygen from the atmosphere? hatrack Mar 2016 #22
Close. Here's a description of the problems they had GliderGuider Mar 2016 #27
Apples and Oranges. Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #30
I was commenting on Dragonfli's reference to closed environments. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #33
Yes, I understand, Paul. Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #38
Yes, I think you're probably right about that. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #39
Yes, I think the new feudal overlords will attempt this: Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #31
The Human infestation will be short-lived StandingInLeftField Mar 2016 #7
That's what it looks like. nt GliderGuider Mar 2016 #10
This gets me in the gut. SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #14
Me too, and I'm 61 years old. Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #32
63, almost 64 here. SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #35
I've been trying to digest this information for 12 years now GliderGuider Mar 2016 #36
I'd also add that much of this was done in the name of anticapitalism MisterP Mar 2016 #20
You lost me when you attached the second law of thermodynamics to, um... NNadir Mar 2016 #23
We have different worldviews? I'm stunned. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #24
Well shriveled is a hard word. NNadir Mar 2016 #25
It has been an enormously useful concept for me. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #26
No offense taken. NNadir Mar 2016 #37
Neoliberal Capitalism and the Second Law GliderGuider Mar 2016 #40
I'm not generally reported as being "civil." That's a new one, but thanks... NNadir Mar 2016 #41
Fortunately the world has room enough for both scientists and philosophers. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #42
Well then, given the clearer perspective on our "philosophical" differences, may I suggest... NNadir Mar 2016 #43
Well said. I think I know what you mean about seeing. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #44
So my husband emails me a link to this, says Bigmack Mar 2016 #28
Humans just don't do limits. GliderGuider Mar 2016 #29
Because we use our minds The2ndWheel Mar 2016 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»In Just 60 Years, Neolibe...»Reply #43