Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
5. The article while a good read also ignores the obvious.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:26 AM
Dec 2015

The purpose of ISIS, and our real objectives in Syria. The fact that Putin intervened doesn't change the goals.



“The end of the Assad regime would sever Hezbollah’s lifeline to Iran, eliminate a long-standing threat to Israel, bolster Lebanon’s sovereignty and independence, and inflict a strategic defeat on the Iranian regime. It would be a geopolitical success of the first order. More than all of the compelling moral and humanitarian reasons, this is why Assad cannot be allowed to succeed and remain in power: We have a clear national security interest in his defeat. And that alone should incline us to tolerate a large degree of risk in order to see that this goal is achieved.


http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/floor-statements?ID=e460be36-c488-e7de-8c38-64c3751adfce

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Putin's Power Play in Syr...»Reply #5