Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Foreign Affairs

Showing Original Post only (View all)

toddmiller

(75 posts)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 06:14 PM Dec 2012

Why Diplomats Who Make Threats Should Rarely Be Trusted & Are Rarely Effective [View all]

According to theories of threat making, the way most leaders & politicians threaten other countries has nothing to do with changing the behavior of what your threatening. More often than not, it's a political ploy to make yourself appear to be a strong leader.

The problem with the strategy is that its destructive and I believe it keeps the war as opposed to promoting peace. It angers those who are threatened and it seldom gives reasonable ways for those threatened to extricate themselves from the situation which is a tell that the threat-maker is just chest thumping and really can't way what his countries true intentions are.

I think this sort of behavior perpetuates needless defense build ups and wars that are prepetuated by hatred. Yet, I also see that politically it works. People seem to like chest-thumping candidates so my question is what can be done to break this cycle?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Why Diplomats Who Make Th...»Reply #0