Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Undercover Israeli troops raid hospital, kill Palestinian [View all]leftynyc
(26,060 posts)13. If you mean I don't use
words that don't mean what I wish them to mean but use them for what they actually mean, then yes. You want to use the word apartheid because it causes a visceral reaction and that's the only reason you want to use it. Not because it's what you're describing. That would be entirely your problem. And frankly, stuff your hasbarist bullshit - nobody pays me to defend Israel so you can stop LYING about that also. All you fucking do is lie about posters who disagree with you. It's repulsive.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
An answer worthy of Ben Carson. His grain silo theory is more plausible than your claims.
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#7
Your views are perfectly in line with Netanyahu and the extreme elements of Likud, who deny there
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#9
you're clinging to a distinction without a difference, and people who say the Palestinians are in
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#11
so you're maintaining that South Africans don't know what apartheid means.
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#14
Mandella, a big fan of Israeli policy? So big a fan the racist Netanyahu couldn't
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#30
Yea, he thought colonialism and Israeli policy was SUPER..just like you do.
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#37
And recognized by no one of import. No western democracies take that bullshit seriously.
shira
Nov 2015
#51
International law is for fascists and totalitarians? Next, what? You have zero to refute
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#52
Remember this is about Apartheid and Colonialism. No Western nations buy that crap....
shira
Nov 2015
#53
You're the one who has no links to support anything..none. What's wrong, you have no clue how
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#54
When Western nations, Amnesty & HRW say Israel is apartheid then there will be links.
shira
Nov 2015
#55
You offered nothing to counter Dugard is not correct, that the former mayor of Jerusalem is not
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#56
You've already been given the evidence, there are two different systems in place, and it is
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#58
Dugard's explanation which you deny over your inept semantics attempt? No, we don't agree.
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#62
Then you didn't read the report.I changed no subject, first words I stated: Dugard vs your
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#64
What I see is a person attempting to refute a man with these credentials and an indepth
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#31
Sure, Dugard accuses Israel of Grand & Petty Apartheid, Bantustans & Racial Discrimination....
shira
Nov 2015
#40
Your inability to refute anything he stated is noted. You're also misrepresenting
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#45
The Likud line of defense, make nonsensical assertions of what he actually said.
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#34
You're not going to answer my questions? Where are these bantustan accussations?
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#39
Ok, it appeared to me you were suggesting he was labeling the WB a bantustan before
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#43
Well, I suppose your reading of the Guardian article supports a different version, I just can't
Little Tich
Nov 2015
#25