Israel orders destruction of entire West Bank village

[pelsar]

90. i dont believe in altering historical facts...clearly you do-perhaps that is what you call logic

you made the claim about the 6 day war that the arab armies could have continued to fight....i just corrected you.
_______

do you notice a pattern here because i do:

1) first you make a statement that is entirely false.
2) i call you out on it and then correct you with a brief summary
3) you then claim that history is no longer relevant
4) you then go into a few paragraphs of how israel is wrong today....
____

now i'm sure there is some term used to describe your system, but i really don't know it. We all know you have an ideology that drives your opinion,that is based on the "victim" cannot be held responsible for their actions and the stronger is responsible for all actions philosophy.

In order to justify this ideology you want to use history to show just how much of a bully israel is and how its violent actions have nothing to do with anything any arab country or the Palestinians have done. The problem with what your trying to do, is that history doesn't agree with you.

you actually have to either ignore attacks on israel, pretend they don't really count, or redefine what the meaning of an attack is. (you've done all in these short few hours)

As we have discovered here, that goes in line with the philosophy of "the ends justifies the means" which translates into "anything that works", the concept of credibility, accuracy is not relevant if it does not help us toward our goal: a dictatorships based on the proper genetics.

I would hold your "end game" is not only immoral, but your means is immoral as well....add to that your pushing for "enduring injustice"

making up facts, having a blind eye to actual events, must always be called out for those others who are interested in knowing what actually happened and want to base their opinion on that-its called "having an open mind"