Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Shaktimaan

(5,397 posts)
16. That's funny.
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 03:49 AM
Nov 2012
But when international law says very clearly that occupation is defined by having control of a territory from outside, from a government outside, that's precisely what we have in Gaza.


Rather than prove your point, what your quote actually does here is invalidate the credibility of your source. You see, international law doesn't say anything like that. Occupation is only in effect in areas that are directly under the control of the enemy military. Control over airspace and waterways does not imply that all of Gaza is occupied territory. There's no question that the main authority in Gaza is Hamas.

The actual accepted definition of occupied territory is:

Article 42 of the 1907 Hague Regulations (HR) states that a " territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised. "


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»This might shed a little ...»Reply #16