Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israel/Palestine

Violet_Crumble

(36,388 posts)

24. Then I take it you wouldn't have a problem with any bigoted source regardless of what side it's on..

Reply to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #22)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 03:56 AM

Dec 2011

I'm not sure what form of reality anyone can attain from hatefilled and bigoted crap like Arutz Sheva, for example, nor why anyone would go looking for facts there as opposed to using a source that's not full of hate.

Y'know what? If you don't have a problem with Arutz Sheva being used here, I don't have a problem with DEBKA or anything else being used. Let's just make it open season...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Skinner just made me host of this group [View all] Lithos Dec 2011 OP

Good news! Mosby Dec 2011 #1

And there was much rejoicing oberliner Dec 2011 #2

+1. nt bemildred Dec 2011 #3

surprise well not really but good news azurnoir Dec 2011 #4

DEBKA? Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #6

It was the most RW thing I could think of off hand that wasn't an out right hate site or blog azurnoir Dec 2011 #8

From DU3's TOS: Scurrilous Dec 2011 #10

But to one degree or another they already are allowed azurnoir Dec 2011 #11

Now thats what I call low hanging fruit. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #12

Arutz Sheva? I'd agree but it's been used as a source as recently azurnoir Dec 2011 #13

No was referring to choosing DEBKA as an example. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #14

ah I was wondering just what you meant azurnoir Dec 2011 #17

Sorry, I think this is all getting lost in translation Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #19

You don't have a problem with a source that regularly expressed hatred and bigotry? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #20

No, because I am not easily inflamed and have thicker skin than most Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #22

Then I take it you wouldn't have a problem with any bigoted source regardless of what side it's on.. Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #24

I approach things differently than you do. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #27

Obviously. I don't make excuses for bigoted sources only on one 'side'... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #28

I have to ask Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #30

Sure did. This whole discussion was about bigoted sources... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #31

Help me understand then. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #32

Hamas is NOT part of the PA, which is the governing body Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #33

Scroll up. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #34

This message was self-deleted by its author Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #35

Totally agree with Azurnoir. I'd like to see all kinds of sources.... shira Dec 2011 #7

+1. nt bemildred Dec 2011 #9

I really don't want to have to wade through a group full of bigoted sources... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #16

well as you can see above not everyone thinks of Arutz Sheva as bigoted azurnoir Dec 2011 #18

And I'm sure there's folk who believe David Duke isn't bigoted... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #21

There is a difference between PRESSTV and A7 Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #23

A totally irrelevant one, might I add... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #25

Yay! Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #5

That works for me... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #15

My condolences, I shall pray for you aletier_v Dec 2011 #26

good idea. BootinUp Dec 2011 #29