Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: NY Times, MSNBC Whitewash BDS [View all]shira
(30,109 posts)17. No it doesn't. And if you're interested in the truth, you wouldn't have the hardest time....
...answering the simplest questions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You see, Shira, it's the message that you should be concerned about and not the messenger.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Feb 2013
#4
The message...? What, that BDS haters are gaining traction? And that's a good thing?
shira
Feb 2013
#12
I'm asking your view on BDS and you're deflecting. Is this difficult for you? n/t
shira
Feb 2013
#25
I never wrote that I support "The BDS people." I may have posted one or two articles in I/P
R. Daneel Olivaw
Feb 2013
#41
Israel needs to follow what the UN has laid out with regards to resolutions, shira.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Feb 2013
#46
No you weren't. What exactly do you think the UN calls for WRT an end to the conflict? n/t
shira
Feb 2013
#52
Let's start slow: Should Israel uproot all its settlements according to UN policy?
shira
Feb 2013
#58
If "Fibi" torpedoed Oslo in 1997, how do you explain the Clinton Initiatives of 2001....
shira
Feb 2013
#109
Looks like you're having a problem with simple logic. If Bibi was so successful in 1997....
shira
Feb 2013
#130
"Well yes, but I'm pretty sure that Israel has a different understanding of what the UN is than you.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Feb 2013
#98
They never have an answer. Must suck to never be able to defend one's position....
shira
Feb 2013
#131
Not a Mistake, Misunderstanding, or Well-Intended Criticism But a Deliberate Campaign to Bash Israel
shira
Feb 2013
#3
"especially seeking to undermine its support in the Jewish community..."
R. Daneel Olivaw
Feb 2013
#5
Think 'The Jewish Community' as a whole would be more likely to agree with you or Shira ? nt
King_David
Feb 2013
#8
No it doesn't. And if you're interested in the truth, you wouldn't have the hardest time....
shira
Feb 2013
#17
You're welcome. For what, I don't know b/c I wasn't answering a question of yours. n/t
shira
Feb 2013
#26
Again, you refuse to answer the simplest questions. A good example of this bashing...
shira
Feb 2013
#15
Still deflecting. And quite poorly. Let me know when you wish to really discuss....
shira
Feb 2013
#18
You're denying truth, fact, and reality. There were 2 real deals in 2001 and 2008...
shira
Feb 2013
#43
Not surprising you avoid a simple question, again. Why do you feel the need to conceal....
shira
Feb 2013
#53
Effective annexation: Israel now stamping passports of West Bank visitors “Judea and Samaria only”
delrem
Feb 2013
#34
Making up BS propaganda about Olmert's offer again? Why? You've been proven wrong...
shira
Feb 2013
#42
Making up so now both Haaretz and Ynet are lying well okay then if you say so n/t
azurnoir
Feb 2013
#65
no just that the rest of the Israeli government and its current PM would not honor Olmerts plan
azurnoir
Feb 2013
#111
The point is that Abbas rejected a good deal w/o a counter-offer. Do you really believe....
shira
Feb 2013
#112
Israels go9vernment rejected the offer NOT as Olmert has stated Abbas did not reject his offer
azurnoir
Feb 2013
#113
Now that you read it from Abbas, do you believe Olmert's offer was so bad that it didn't merit....
shira
Feb 2013
#117
BS - Not all Dems are in favor of Choice, but that doesn't mean the Democratic Party opposes it.
leveymg
Feb 2013
#51
Who are these "significant BDS leaders"? I'll give you a list twice as long of 2-staters.
leveymg
Feb 2013
#59
"That's your interpretation, the source of your hysteria. So?" is an affirmation and a question. n/t
delrem
Feb 2013
#85
Merely saying that it's my interpretation, so? is a denial of the interpretation.
aranthus
Feb 2013
#87
You're being idiotic! Of course it's your interpretation! Why would I deny that?
delrem
Feb 2013
#88
Are you happy to have voiced your opinion yet again? Here, another ovation for you:
delrem
Feb 2013
#107
While there is no policy, most groups associated with BDS support the 2-state approach
leveymg
Feb 2013
#70
Nobody has to accept the entire program, so there is no inherent contradiction.
leveymg
Feb 2013
#127
your post was really about Hamas taking over now that you've edited your post to include them :)
azurnoir
Feb 2013
#90
No, my post was about a Palestinian state that doesn't have to make peace with Israel.
aranthus
Feb 2013
#93
so now you claim a Palestinian state that is at war with Israel will be formed because of BDS?
azurnoir
Feb 2013
#95
in your scenario BDS would be the sole factor in the establisment of a Palestinian state
azurnoir
Feb 2013
#100
The Palestinians may be driving the train, but it's unlikely that they will be
leveymg
Feb 2013
#129