Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Violet_Crumble

(36,421 posts)
59. I'll repeat myself again seeing you ignored what I said...
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 10:18 PM
Feb 2013

Of course he's a warmongering butcher. Are you totally unaware of his history?


You must be to be sitting there getting offended because he got called exactly what he was...



-------------------------------

I'm taking it yr totally unaware of not really caring about his history, or you think he didn't exist and hadn't done anything bad prior to the massacre?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Israel ? How about the actual perpetrators of the massacres? King_David Feb 2013 #1
Yeah, pass the buck as usual. Good work if you can get it. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #2
The Lebanese Christians militia had anything at all to do with the massacres ? King_David Feb 2013 #3
And this is the same tired argument that I had to entertain with R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #5
This is the same excuse you use to whitewash Palestinian oppression in Lebanon, Syria.... shira Feb 2013 #6
And right on cue the level of self righteousness climbs right off the charts. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #10
In your world, not only is Israel accountable for how others treat Palestinians.... shira Feb 2013 #11
You need to quit the nasty attacks on other DUers and start focusing on issues... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #14
No they don't oberliner Feb 2013 #19
I agree it's a pot meets kettle post. nt King_David Feb 2013 #21
Weird how certain DUers feel they can lecture others on how they have to behave oberliner Feb 2013 #24
It's an online game for some... shira Feb 2013 #25
Exactly ... King_David Feb 2013 #26
heh, the whole team comes to the rescue. delrem Feb 2013 #27
Yoo hoo! Shira? Where did you vanish to? Who's 'your lot'? Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #36
It takes a great deal of energy to defend Sharon and express her deep concerns for the Tibetan Jefferson23 Feb 2013 #41
LOL. Things I learnt about Tibet today... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #50
I'm certain I know, say no more. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2013 #58
Who did they remind you of ? nt King_David Feb 2013 #71
A few 'supporters' of Israel I've encountered n/t Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #74
These are my words, Shira...bolstered by the Kahan Commission findings. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #20
I understand you want to hold Israel accountable. That's fair.... shira Feb 2013 #23
Everybody associated with this massacre should be tried for war crimes. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #28
But they haven't been. And you're voicing zero concern about that. shira Feb 2013 #29
"But they haven't been. And you're voicing zero concern about that." R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #30
Just what are you accusing Sharon of? Before you answer, look at the Kahan findings.... shira Feb 2013 #31
Accusing? He didn't stop the massacre when he could of. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #32
You're assuming he knew in advance or knew once it was happening. You're wrong... shira Feb 2013 #33
: : :Sigh: : : R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #34
You called Sharon a butcher, trying to attribute maximum blame to him as an accessory... shira Feb 2013 #35
Sharon was a fucking butcher. And a warmongering criminal... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #44
Yes, Sharon is a butcher to you whether or not he was an accessory. shira Feb 2013 #46
Of course he's a warmongering butcher. Are you totally unaware of his history? Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #48
You say he's a warmongering butcher, regardless whether or not he was an accessory? shira Feb 2013 #55
I'll repeat myself again seeing you ignored what I said... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #59
Wait - so he's a butcher because of something else, not Sabra/Shatilla? Is that yr view now? n/t shira Feb 2013 #60
Actually Sharon was given that title, but not by me. I guess he earned it. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #68
They just expressed their concern over it. Maybe you should read before hitting reply? n/t Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #42
Have you even bothered reading the Kahan Report? Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #38
Here are the findings, showing you're falsely accusing Sharon... shira Feb 2013 #43
Where's the link to where you got that from? The report found Sharon personally responsible... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #47
What I quoted is a C&P from the report. You'd know that if you read it. shira Feb 2013 #54
I knew that. You'd know that if you read my post. Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #65
If you read the report, you'd know your claims aren't supported by it. n/t shira Feb 2013 #69
Sorry, but the report did hold Sharon indirectly and personally responsible... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #76
Wow you remind me of my schoolteacher King_David Feb 2013 #72
That's rude and uncalled for, Dave. I thought you were into being civil... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #75
Why'd you leave out the link? He was found at least negligent. Jefferson23 Feb 2013 #52
I agree he was negligent. Do u think that makes him more guilty than the Phalange? n/t shira Feb 2013 #56
If you even imagine I'm going to discuss the meaning of negligence with you, forget it. Jefferson23 Feb 2013 #61
That was a really simple question. Is Sharon more guilty than the Phalange? Can't even answer.... shira Feb 2013 #64
ugh, you're the one who has difficulty with it. We're done here. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2013 #67
well how could anyone blame Israel for what happened in an area under IDF control azurnoir Feb 2013 #4
A lot of people think Israel was more responsible than the actual perpetrators King_David Feb 2013 #7
No one is forgiving anyone here azurnoir Feb 2013 #8
There's an old Roman saying. "He who profits from a crime commits the crime." R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #9
No, that's what you mistakenly think 'a lot of people' think... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #15
Oh please explain Vi nt King_David Feb 2013 #22
I figured you had no idea Dave n/t Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #40
Sharon wasn't accused by the Kahan Commission of being an accessory. But do go on.... shira Feb 2013 #37
He was held responsible by it for his part in it... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #39
He wasn't an accessory as you claimed. You were wrong. See #43 for Kahan findings. n/t shira Feb 2013 #45
Oh, so you agree that he was personally responsible then? Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #49
Wait - hold up. You were wrong accusing Sharon of being an accessory. Right? n/t shira Feb 2013 #51
I'm quite happy to change it to him being personally responsible. So, do you agree with that? Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #53
So what is it? Do you believe he was personally responsible or indirectly responsible? n/t shira Feb 2013 #57
I asked you if you agreed with the Report's findings on Sharon.... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #62
Of course I agree. I ask you b/c you're contradicting yourself. I want to know where you stand.... shira Feb 2013 #63
I'm not contradicting myself at all. I just told you what the Report finding was about Sharon... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #66
Do you believe Sharon is at least as guilty/responsible as the Phalange for SS? n/t shira Feb 2013 #70
Sharon was indirectly responsible and the Phalangists were directly responsible... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #73
S is trying desperately to move the topic away from Sharon R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #78
Sharon ... looked away. But only after firing illuminating flares... n/t delrem Feb 2013 #79
While misleading the Americans about what was happening. Shame. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #80
Isn't it wonderful how the term 'terrorists' is used in that snippet? n/t delrem Feb 2013 #81
Yep. Women and children. Terrorists. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #82
I figured I wouldn't be the only one to notice that... Violet_Crumble Feb 2013 #83
I think that's called being an accessory azurnoir Feb 2013 #84
No complaint about the source? oberliner Feb 2013 #12
no why bother except to distract and there is no need for that azurnoir Feb 2013 #13
What are some stinky ones? oberliner Feb 2013 #16
I wasn't complete enough in my wording azurnoir Feb 2013 #17
OK oberliner Feb 2013 #18
Sharon is and has always been a pos. rateyes Feb 2013 #77
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Sharon warned Begin Israe...»Reply #59