Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
6. The article is a joke. Did you catch the part where the writer condemns Israeli...
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 03:23 PM
Feb 2012

...expansion both within and beyond the 1967 lines?

Think about what that means for second.

It's legitimate to call into question Israeli expansion into the territories beyond the '67 lines. But within? Israel cannot "expand" within their own borders? Is this writer fucking serious?

FFS, she condemns all-Jewish settlements - these would be settlements within Israel - that will be built in the Negev. So Jews living both within and outside the green line are settlers?



That's also a joke due to the fact that any Israeli can live in the Negev or anywhere else in Israel they choose to live - Jewish or not - by law. Here's that stupidity in the article...

As Israel steps up its expansionist policies both inside and outside the Green Line, the Bedouin community has come under particularly intense pressure.

Inside Israel, the state seeks to Judaize the Negev (Naqab) desert. This “development” includes last year’s Prawer plan, which recommends that Israel relocate between 30,000 and 40,000 Bedouin citizens, ripping them from their villages and sticking them in impoverished townships, to clear the area for Jewish-only settlements.


Who says that only Jews will live there and that this is a racial issue? Do you realize there are many Arabs in the Israeli government? There's nothing stopping other Israeli bedouins or any other Israeli Arabs from moving into those areas with - OMG - the Jews. Housing costs in the Negev will surely be cheaper than up north in Israel where the cost is astronomical. I'd be shocked if the non-Jews of Israel don't take advantage of moving down south where housing costs are better.

Finally, she makes the idiotic argument that anyone in Israel expecting Bedouins to start a bloody Intifada is a racist/colonialist, etc. But she and her other anti-Israel comrades always tell us that bloody terror from Palestinians is natural and to be expected due to Israeli policies. She and her like minded mental midgets can't have it both ways.
Where is the Bedouin Intifada? [View all] Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 OP
A thread from DU2 about the Bedouin displacement... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #1
recommend madrchsod Feb 2012 #2
"seeks to Judaize the Negev" holdencaufield Feb 2012 #3
Yeah, it's like it's illegal to have Jews living in certain parts of pre-1967 Israel. shira Feb 2012 #4
Yeah... sure is funny parkia00 Feb 2012 #5
The article is a joke. Did you catch the part where the writer condemns Israeli... shira Feb 2012 #6
Have to agree - it struck me as well. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #7
What 'insinuation' did you stop reading at? Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #9
That the Bedouin were violent people nt Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #10
Who made that insinuation? Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #11
Yes - the author. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #12
No, she wasn't the one making the insinuation of violence. She was saying Israeli officials did.. Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #13
Why I noted "Israeli or not" Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #14
Druize? shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #18
I have. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #22
Did you meet his brother the Jewish bedouin? shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #23
No, it was a camp, and they were wonderful Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #24
They were all wonderful? shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #26
No, was there for work (visa), and south of Beersheeva. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #27
Well there you have it folks... shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #28
LOl I was thinking much the same n/t azurnoir Feb 2012 #29
Curved like a scimitar was his manhood... shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #35
just for fun.... pelsar Feb 2012 #36
she maintains that she was not confused shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #39
then have your "fun".... pelsar Feb 2012 #42
Darn... parkia00 Feb 2012 #17
You were hoping you could label this action as racist policy, right? shira Feb 2012 #21
And you don't? parkia00 Feb 2012 #34
they aren't nomadic, haven't been for many many years.....n/t pelsar Feb 2012 #38
The settlements will indeed be Jewish only... shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #19
Nonsense. Non-Jews will have a field day in court if they're not allowed to live... shira Feb 2012 #20
The JNF is bound by its own charter to only sell to Jews shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #25
As always, you're only partially correct... shira Feb 2012 #30
And that half could easily be accomodated without destroying Bedouin villages. Ken Burch Feb 2012 #32
So are you conceding that the settlements are partially racist? shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #33
Israel's very liberal supreme court won't allow any continuation of racism against Israeli citizens shira Feb 2012 #43
Actually, I am the one opposing racism... shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #44
I'm not buying that. If you opposed racism... shira Feb 2012 #46
A load of bullshit, as usual... shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #47
The term being used to mean "ethnically cleanse" Crunchy Frog Feb 2012 #8
I guess the definition of Intifada these days is azurnoir Feb 2012 #15
That was my challenge as I was chatting with VC upthread. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #16
Well, if the Israeli government wants to make sure there's no Bedouin Intifada Ken Burch Feb 2012 #31
no ken.... pelsar Feb 2012 #37
It is their land shaayecanaan Feb 2012 #45
its not bedouin land..its the states land pelsar Feb 2012 #48
Israel: Cancel plan to forcibly displace Jahalin Bedouin communities Feb. 8, 2012 Jefferson23 Feb 2012 #40
the community should be moved oto a different site in he WB azurnoir Feb 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Where is the Bedouin Inti...»Reply #6