Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ok, DU3 guideline commentary [View all] Lithos Dec 2011 OP
Thank you for the imput libodem Dec 2011 #1
Some thoughts oberliner Dec 2011 #2
Those are great questions Lithos Dec 2011 #5
I was on a jury tonight about a thread here Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #6
why would those results "surprise" you? azurnoir Dec 2011 #7
Never saw it. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #8
actually it was GD not LBN which was why the question mark n/t azurnoir Dec 2011 #9
Okay, I'm confused. I thought alerts on OPs went to the group hosts, not a jury... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #15
Alerts don't go to hosts - they go to a randomly selected jury oberliner Dec 2011 #16
The post that Ruby talks about is an OP, not a post in a thread... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #18
maybe we can PM Lithos Mosby Dec 2011 #27
Hosts can't hide posts though. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #29
Locking posts that bypass the IP rules should be sufficient IMO. nt Mosby Dec 2011 #31
But are we agreed on what those rules are? oberliner Dec 2011 #32
im suggesting a process Mosby Dec 2011 #33
But what would be the point of that as a process? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #38
Hosts can lock OPs and other stuff Mosby Dec 2011 #43
Yeah, I'm a host so I know how it works... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #46
I didn't know that about OP alerts. Mosby Dec 2011 #48
You can check it out by hitting the alert button on any OP... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #59
I find it stunning, yet awesome. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #64
Keep in mind that this is only for the opening post Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #34
Thank you - I know this took alot of time, thought and work. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #3
I share some of Oberliner's concerns. bemildred Dec 2011 #4
I have some comments. Scurrilous Dec 2011 #10
"Nuke Arutz Sheva". How about nuking PRESS-TV and MAAN too? shira Dec 2011 #47
What Palestinian source do you think is OK? oberliner Dec 2011 #49
None. They're all state controlled either by Hamas or the PA. shira Dec 2011 #52
Not certain what you mean by your list of "recurring themes". Crunchy Frog Dec 2011 #11
Concur that single state solution should be inbounds ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #14
I agree LeftishBrit Dec 2011 #25
I am glad they didn't hard code against sources Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #12
Thank you for your efforts however I would agree with Bemildred and oberliner n/t azurnoir Dec 2011 #13
Oberliner and Scurrilous have pretty much covered it for me... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #17
Wanted to add a Thank You oberliner Dec 2011 #19
Where do you find the jury rulings? n/t Dick Dastardly Dec 2011 #28
They are sent after the ruling to the jury members, Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #30
Don't you rather refute your own point about single-staters? Donald Ian Rankin Dec 2011 #20
Respectfully Disagree holdencaufield Dec 2011 #22
I don't see that inevitability. Donald Ian Rankin Dec 2011 #23
Regarding DU3. I had hoped this would be an opportunity for the I/P group Jefferson23 Dec 2011 #21
I agree with everything in your post. Crunchy Frog Dec 2011 #35
So make it more. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #36
Putting aside sources for now Mosby Dec 2011 #24
Firstly huge thanks for this! LeftishBrit Dec 2011 #26
I am glad this is being revised. Behind the Aegis Dec 2011 #37
If I might: bemildred Dec 2011 #42
I agree with a lot of this LeftishBrit Dec 2011 #51
A question about sources... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #39
I will answer this later tonight Lithos Dec 2011 #40
Thanks... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #44
FWIW, I am OK with banning Ynet for OPs, it's not like it's all that useful. bemildred Dec 2011 #41
I'm happy to throw in Zmag just to show how serious I am! Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #45
LOL. bemildred Dec 2011 #50
! Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #53
Sources Lithos Dec 2011 #54
OT - Bonus points for the early 1980s porn reference. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #55
That was pretty funny. Behind the Aegis Dec 2011 #58
I can't speak for the others, but I am non-plussed. Behind the Aegis Dec 2011 #56
Short answer Lithos Dec 2011 #61
Yes, I think that "Is it news?" is the right question. bemildred Dec 2011 #62
That helps. Thanks. Behind the Aegis Dec 2011 #65
What about International Crisis Group? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #66
On topic - Palestinian News Sources Ruby the Liberal Dec 2011 #57
Thanks for the explanation... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Dec 2011 #63
Giving this a kick to add something about OPs unrelated to the I/P conflict... Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #67
Guess you never read the article huh? King_David Jan 2012 #68
I read the article and it wasn't about Israel, nor is it about not liking an article... Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #70
Former staffer says Ron Paul is Anti-Israel and uncomfortable around Gays King_David Jan 2012 #71
That's not the OP you posted in this group... Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #72
Very thankful that Lithos and UGGR are the hosts of this group. nt King_David Jan 2012 #73
Good. Then I suggest you allow people to give them suggestions on future guidelines... Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #74
Ron Paul , is also not an anti-Semite, even though he is “most certainly” not a fan of Israel King_David Jan 2012 #69
Problem is, where do we draw the line? LeftishBrit Jan 2012 #75
I think that'd be something for the hosts to decide.... Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #77
Or like the post about Pam Geller? oberliner Jan 2012 #76
I don't really care about OPs about antisemitism or Islamophobia... Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #78
The Ron Paul bathroom post does address his perceived anti-semitism oberliner Jan 2012 #79
Israel was a fleeting reference... Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #80
OPs should have at least a fleeting reference to something Israeli or Palestinian oberliner Jan 2012 #81
There was nothing 'fleeting' about it King_David Jan 2012 #82
Of course it was fleeting. There were only two passing mentions of Israel in the entire article... Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #83
You seem to think somehow erroneously that your a host in this group. King_David Jan 2012 #84
You are using the wrong "your" here oberliner Jan 2012 #85
That is true , thank you nt King_David Jan 2012 #86
Of course I don't. What a silly thing to say n/t Violet_Crumble Jan 2012 #87
Actually, under the DU3 Community Standards concept Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #88
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Ok, DU3 guideline comment...»Reply #9