Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
21. I think that my challenge was rather mild considering that you stated that my conclusions.....
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 12:17 AM
Feb 2012

were based on having "good weed"

I would like to believe that Israel would exercise restraint, but Israeli politicians seem to move ever rightward.
Trying to decipher a quote from a Sec. of Defense can be tricky, but Panetta saying to a reporter that he believes Israel will attack Iran in the coming months and that he is pleading with the Israelis to put off any strike is not something that is done casually.

I would also like to believe that Iran would exercise restraint even in the face of an attack, but who knows.

My comparison to Bush was a narrow one. It had to do with the placement of questionable stories with the press.
It could have just as easily have been about Bush's father and the supposed rape of American officer's wife by a Panamanian soldier as they began laying down reasons for invading that country, or the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

My point is that I am seeing Israeli government sources trying to lay down the groundwork for a strike, and coupled with the Panetta quote and the howling for blood from the Republican candidates, I am not comforted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Israel is determined to drag us into another one of their wars, We did Iraq isn't that enough. bahrbearian Feb 2012 #1
No one encouraged Iran to target Saudi officials on US soil DUIC Feb 2012 #3
Your not using more suspect plots, are you? that one is a joke. bahrbearian Feb 2012 #5
Not a terribly funny joke to the potential victims at the targeted Cafe Milano DUIC Feb 2012 #9
Talk about international intrigue. Lawlbringer Feb 2012 #2
would you care for a False Flag Operation with your fries? virtualobserver Feb 2012 #4
How about some Yellow Cake instead. bahrbearian Feb 2012 #6
You mean like 911? DUIC Feb 2012 #10
when an article is sourced to a government, and that government has a specific aim virtualobserver Feb 2012 #11
But as propaganda it does make sense in a way- in the way that Israel wants/needs US assistance azurnoir Feb 2012 #12
exactly, it makes perfect sense as propaganda virtualobserver Feb 2012 #14
Got it. Big Government is evil. DUIC Feb 2012 #13
your position is therefore that if I don't buy the propaganda, I'm paranoid......very amusing. virtualobserver Feb 2012 #15
Those two aren't even close to the same. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #16
I understand Israel's motivation but fear isn't a more noble excuse than greed virtualobserver Feb 2012 #17
Far more serious? Put Santorum in the whitehouse? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #18
If Iran responds to an attack from Israel energy prices skyrocket worldwide virtualobserver Feb 2012 #19
Thank you for challenging my intelligence. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #20
I think that my challenge was rather mild considering that you stated that my conclusions..... virtualobserver Feb 2012 #21
I do concede that the Panetta comment made my spine tingle for a moment. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #22
Ahmadinejad's rhetoric has been insane..... virtualobserver Feb 2012 #23
Ah...a little early evening propaganda AnOhioan Feb 2012 #7
Has Iran hired the Three Stooges to carry out this arm of its foreign policy? Crunchy Frog Feb 2012 #8
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»The Iranian Threat to New...»Reply #21