I trust the gentle reader will not be too shocked to learn that this, in fact, is not the case. In fact, Ms. Sigan and Dr. Davids version of events was refuted very convincingly that very day by a rather unimpeachable source an Israeli physician with higher standing than Dr. David, both medically and by Israeli security ratings. He is Dr. Rafi Walden, Deputy Director of the Sheba Medical Center and one of the personal physicians of a certain elder statesman named Shimon Peres (The First Citizen, aka President of the State of Israel).
So, on the one hand we have Dr. Walden, the second in command at Israels largest medical facility, and a man trusted enough by the establishment to treat the living embodiment of Israeli sovereignty. On the other hand we have Dr. David, who Im sure is a competent enough physician in his own right, but evidently not as prominent professionally, nor as senior security-wise.
Dr. Walden states flatly that Dr. Davids testimony according to which the injuries Mr. Al-Dura claimed to have sustained the day of his sons death were actually sustained some years before, at the hands of Palestinians, treated by Dr. David himself was false. Again: Dr. Davids statement, for which he was sued, was indeed false. The French Supreme Court did not contest this. It simply found that Dr. David wasnt criminally liable for his erroneous statement, because he had reasonable cause to be misled. In other words, Dr. David may not know what hes talking about, and may not have read the full Al-Dura medical file despite it being made available to him, a file which shows gunshot wounds which he did not treat back in 1992, and indications of surgery by doctors in Gaza and in Amman following the events of 2000. Dr. Walden, on the other hand, did read the 50-page file.