Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Why Liberals Must Repudiate the BDS Movement [View all]FarrenH
(768 posts)29. Because defending yourself requires settling your civilians in occupied territory
Right....
This tired argument is so self evidently vacuous it doesn't deserve a detailed response. But hey, keep defending Apartheid and theft if that's your thing. Just don't pretend you're a liberal while doing it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
129 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is silly, the occupation has been going on for well over forty years. Bibi
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#1
Rebuttal to empty talking points? nah..you're having too much fun with them.
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#6
I think the U.S. had better get ready to give back Texas, New Mexico, and much more to Mexico nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#103
You mean the U.S. attack on Mexico, and the treaty forced upon Mexico? Is that the one?
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#107
Oh BS. The attack on Mexico and forcing them to sign a treaty or else was not a violation?
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#116
Maybe not give back, but at least admit the injustice done in stealing that territory from Mexico.
Ken Burch
Mar 2014
#118
Violet could be Australian, but she's posting on a (American) Democratic Party board so all things
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#125
Because defending yourself requires settling your civilians in occupied territory
FarrenH
Mar 2014
#29
Egypt is a sovereign nation. Palestine was not prior to 1948. It was British Imperialist...
shira
Mar 2014
#47
A word of caution, the poster's alleged history lesson was copied and pasted
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#58
This isn't rocket science. I was addressing the false charge that Jews are colonizers...
shira
Mar 2014
#67
Sand recycles hate from neo-nazi websites, claims Jews are descendants of Khazars...
shira
Mar 2014
#73
Just as I thought, you have nothing..thank you. I did look at your Arutz Sheva website, the one
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#80
You are. My previous posts to the one you're citing show that while I concede Arutz-7...
shira
Mar 2014
#92
Ma'an was vindicated by an Israeli judge on incitement and other Palestinian publications.
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#94
It's fascinating u keep supporting, defending, and promoting Maan's racism here. n/t
shira
Mar 2014
#98
Only according to Itamar Marcus,( Palwatch) and settler living in the OPT. n/t
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#100
Your friend "Israeli", like Sand, denies Jews are a people/nation. How about yourself?
shira
Mar 2014
#79
That has been proven to be what his work represents? I did not read his work, as
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#84
Again, Carlo Strenger does not agree with his work yet he does not state nor imply
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#87
Trolling? lol You have nothing to offer other than your opinion on the subject. I posted
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#90
And the U.S. would have to give lots of land back to Mexico, right? In fact, let's go further...
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#104
At the same time, that indigenous heritage doesn't justify the Zionist attitude since the 1940's
Ken Burch
Mar 2014
#121
The occupations in Germany and Japan had nothing in common with the West Bank occupation.
Ken Burch
Mar 2014
#129
...because the President of Brooklyn College Hillel is bitchy at the New York Times?
Scootaloo
Mar 2014
#4
I said exactly what I meant to say but why don't you give us your translation pretty please
azurnoir
Mar 2014
#23
If you read the article, you'd see the author is a liberal who votes Democratic...
shira
Mar 2014
#31
And yet he's writing puff for an outlet that thinks Dubya was a wacky liberal
Scootaloo
Mar 2014
#34
The advisory board list you posted is the 2008 version and looks as it came from Sourcewatch
Dick Dastardly
Mar 2014
#49
What does Luntz have to do with an edited list of the advisory council? nothing!!
Dick Dastardly
Mar 2014
#52