Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

Reter

(2,188 posts)

4. Why are you ignoring the fact that he swam with all his clothes on?

Reply to hack89 (Reply #3)

Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:36 AM

Oct 2015

Swimming with all your clothes on is rare enough, but no one willingly swims with boots on that isn't either very high, drunk, or insane. All I'm saying is it should have not have been so easily dismissed as not suspicious.

Never said the eyewitness being a roadie was relevant, just said he was the only one. Close friends unfortunately means little, but we don't even know if they were. Either way, it's irrelevant.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How come no one thinks singer Jeff Buckley's 1997 drowning is suspicious? [View all] Reter Oct 2015 OP

Because there was an eyewitness hack89 Oct 2015 #1

The only witness was a roadie with his band Reter Oct 2015 #2

Who wanted him dead? hack89 Oct 2015 #3

Why are you ignoring the fact that he swam with all his clothes on? Reter Oct 2015 #4

People do strange things all the time. hack89 Oct 2015 #5

wasn't he drunk? Plus, I thought he had severe depression Fast Walker 52 Oct 2015 #8

So because he went in with his clothes on, it's suspicious? zappaman Oct 2015 #6

It's odd, and a good detective would at least look into it Reter Oct 2015 #7

It was investigated. Ptah Oct 2015 #9

Stranger things have happened! QuebecYank Nov 2015 #10