Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
4. Prove it
Sat May 6, 2017, 06:36 PM
May 2017

sorry but I prefer facts to opinion. show me the raw data used to construct the computer model. the cartoon animation doesn't prove anything except a cover-up.

the official story says nothing about falling debris as a factor of the collapse. falling debris would not have caused the building to freefall straight down in perfect symmetrical fashion in the manner of controlled demolition.



btw, what's the difference between LIHOP and MIHOP?

if you murder somebody does it matter if you did it yourself or hired somebody (make it happen on purpose). what's the difference? you're just as guilty as if you pulled the trigger yourself, especially when you have something to gain from it. In the case of 9/11 there was no absence of motive. Foreign terrorists could not have caused a building controlled demolition.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Why haven't NIST released...»Reply #4