Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

Celebration

(15,812 posts)

18. if she is indicted, she is discredited

Reply to William Seger (Reply #17)

Wed Sep 26, 2012, 07:57 PM

Sep 2012

That is how! She couldn't go on talk shows or television. There may be goverment psychiatrists who would say anything, I have no idea. All I know is that they were not neutral psychiatrists.

Eventually a part of the story got out anyway, or haven't you heard?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=3smid=tw-share&

She was a big witness that the government had advance warning for 9/11, and that it was used as a pretext for war in Iraq. That may be known by all of us now, but this was a big deal a few years ago, plus she had details.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Former CIA Asset (Turned Whistleblower) - Susan Lindauer Comes Clean Re: Fed Invlovement in 9/11... [View all] Indi Guy Aug 2012 OP

bookmarking libodem Aug 2012 #1

thanks, k & r. nt wildbilln864 Aug 2012 #2

Shameless k... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #3

Link for those who might have missed it William Seger Sep 2012 #4

If you watch the video with an open mind... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #5

Persuaded by what? William Seger Sep 2012 #6

So... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #7

Not "totally impossible" but that's not the right question William Seger Sep 2012 #8

How can her claims be believed or refuted if they're not heard? Indi Guy Sep 2012 #9

one reason Celebration Sep 2012 #10

A reason to "listen carefully" is not a reason to be gullible William Seger Sep 2012 #12

You've agreed that... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #13

That really doesn't make any sense William Seger Sep 2012 #14

you aren't being logical Celebration Sep 2012 #16

Your "just so" story isn't logical William Seger Sep 2012 #17

if she is indicted, she is discredited Celebration Sep 2012 #18

Point is, there is no reason whatsoever to believe that William Seger Sep 2012 #19

well from that same article Celebration Sep 2012 #20

No, "... my contact in the C.I.A." is not the same as William Seger Sep 2012 #21

So why did the prosecution prosecute her in the first place? hack89 Sep 2012 #22

I wonder! Celebration Sep 2012 #23

wow very informative stuff skor584_2il Sep 2012 #11

She is a court certified insane person - and she never was a CIA agent hack89 Sep 2012 #15