Creative Speculation

Celebration

(15,812 posts)

20. well from that same article

Thu Sep 27, 2012, 01:32 PM

Sep 2012

Not long after their first dinner, Hoven introduced Lindauer to his friend Dr. Richard Fuisz, a globe-trotting Virginia-based businessman whom Lindauer described to me as ''my contact in the C.I.A.''

So she was claiming to be a CIA asset then.

And then there is this--

Citing unnamed sources, The Sunday Herald, a Scottish newspaper, reported in 2000 that Fuisz had been the C.I.A.'s most important agent in Damascus during the 80's. ''This is not an issue I can confirm or deny,'' Fuisz told The Herald. ''I am not allowed to speak about these issues. In fact, I can't even explain why I can't speak about these issues.''

Fuisz claims to have known her but that is about it. Is he telling the whole truth or not? I have no idea, but it isn't as if she is the only one who said he was CIA.

Read the article a little more carefully.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Former CIA Asset (Turned Whistleblower) - Susan Lindauer Comes Clean Re: Fed Invlovement in 9/11... [View all] Indi Guy Aug 2012 OP

bookmarking libodem Aug 2012 #1

thanks, k & r. nt wildbilln864 Aug 2012 #2

Shameless k... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #3

Link for those who might have missed it William Seger Sep 2012 #4

If you watch the video with an open mind... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #5

Persuaded by what? William Seger Sep 2012 #6

So... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #7

Not "totally impossible" but that's not the right question William Seger Sep 2012 #8

How can her claims be believed or refuted if they're not heard? Indi Guy Sep 2012 #9

one reason Celebration Sep 2012 #10

A reason to "listen carefully" is not a reason to be gullible William Seger Sep 2012 #12

You've agreed that... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #13

That really doesn't make any sense William Seger Sep 2012 #14

you aren't being logical Celebration Sep 2012 #16

Your "just so" story isn't logical William Seger Sep 2012 #17

if she is indicted, she is discredited Celebration Sep 2012 #18

Point is, there is no reason whatsoever to believe that William Seger Sep 2012 #19

well from that same article Celebration Sep 2012 #20

No, "... my contact in the C.I.A." is not the same as William Seger Sep 2012 #21

So why did the prosecution prosecute her in the first place? hack89 Sep 2012 #22

I wonder! Celebration Sep 2012 #23

wow very informative stuff skor584_2il Sep 2012 #11

She is a court certified insane person - and she never was a CIA agent hack89 Sep 2012 #15