Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celebration

(15,812 posts)
23. I wonder!
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:34 AM
Sep 2012

It appears that she had contacts with someone purported to be CIA. I have no idea if her story is true or not. But why did they charge her? I have no idea. Whether nuts or not, she was passionately anti-war, and may have been telling everyone the reasons for the Iraq War were manufactured. She was a loose cannon.................. In those days, we actually didn't KNOW the evidence was manufactured, like we do now, so they did now want people spreading that around. She definitely had ties to the Iraqis, so she probably had tales to tell and was telling them.

Just a guess but she probably did have ties to the CIA but was not being paid for it. She probably provided some info that was anit-war in nature. She was probably charged because she could not be trusted and was starting to talk. Back then the media was all into believing the weapons of mass distruction theory and TPTB did not want to disturb that meme.

bookmarking libodem Aug 2012 #1
thanks, k & r. nt wildbilln864 Aug 2012 #2
Shameless k... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #3
Link for those who might have missed it William Seger Sep 2012 #4
If you watch the video with an open mind... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #5
Persuaded by what? William Seger Sep 2012 #6
So... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #7
Not "totally impossible" but that's not the right question William Seger Sep 2012 #8
How can her claims be believed or refuted if they're not heard? Indi Guy Sep 2012 #9
one reason Celebration Sep 2012 #10
A reason to "listen carefully" is not a reason to be gullible William Seger Sep 2012 #12
You've agreed that... Indi Guy Sep 2012 #13
That really doesn't make any sense William Seger Sep 2012 #14
you aren't being logical Celebration Sep 2012 #16
Your "just so" story isn't logical William Seger Sep 2012 #17
if she is indicted, she is discredited Celebration Sep 2012 #18
Point is, there is no reason whatsoever to believe that William Seger Sep 2012 #19
well from that same article Celebration Sep 2012 #20
No, "... my contact in the C.I.A." is not the same as William Seger Sep 2012 #21
So why did the prosecution prosecute her in the first place? hack89 Sep 2012 #22
I wonder! Celebration Sep 2012 #23
wow very informative stuff skor584_2il Sep 2012 #11
She is a court certified insane person - and she never was a CIA agent hack89 Sep 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Former CIA Asset (Turned ...»Reply #23