LGBT
In reply to the discussion: Stinking elephant carcass in the room. 50% of that jury was apparently comprised of homophobic, [View all]racaulk
(11,550 posts)And although the poster in question was an obvious disruptor who has since been banned, that is really irrelevant to this discussion. What is relevant is the jury's decision to leave this post alone and the justifications of those four jurors for making that decision. And that elicits a continued conversation about the issue even after the banishment of that user.
This was a complete and utter failure of the jury system, IMHO, and it will happen again. The question is, what can we do about it? The fact that there is no process to appeal a jury's decision is an incredible and glaring weakness in this new system of self-moderation. If homophobic jurors are adjudicating homophobic posts, then that's a big fucking problem!
This absolutely stinks, and it stinks all the way to the top.
K&R!