LGBT
In reply to the discussion: Stinking elephant carcass in the room. 50% of that jury was apparently comprised of homophobic, [View all]Fearless
(18,458 posts)And I couldn't agree with you more that offensive posts need to be reliably dealt with. And, it is definitely true that we have a constantly changing population of posters. New people come in and old people depart, etc. It seems maddening to have to stay on top of all of that!
At the same time, I can't help but feel that we have a rare chance, with DU, to reach people that we generally agree with who may not have experience with the LGBTQ community and our issues. I think we are 100% agreed that disruptors should be removed from DU. At the same time, I think that even just confronting a well-meaning DUer who said something offensive is an opportunity we can't pass up. Saying: "hey there, what you said really offends me because..." and providing some insight into why it is offensive--I think that has value too.
Can we ever "win"? As in completely eradicate bigoted comments? Not a chance. But "win" as in gain an ally or two... sure every day of the week! A year or two ago, a lot of bigoted speech was acceptable on DU. Thinking back, it's truly remarkable, especially LGBTQ-related comments. If we speak up, and yes ban serial offenders, I think we can continue to make DU a better place for all of our groups!