Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yardwork

(69,347 posts)
3. There seems to be sensitivity right now to any perceived criticism of DU3. I'm taking a wait and see
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 07:44 PM
Dec 2011

approach. I would not have voted to close your earlier thread, but clearly some LGBTQ DUers were uncomfortable with it. I'm guessing that they felt that the thread might be anticipating trouble, and in so doing, stirring up trouble. Maybe a better strategy for those of us wondering how this new system will play out is to wait until trouble arises and then see how well the new system works.

If, after a month or two, we're getting a lot of insensitive or even bigoted posts ignored by juries, then we can talk about it.

Personally, I've often felt that the problems on DU arose from too much moderation rather than too little. Posts that were obviously homophobic were allowed to stay while those of us who attempted to "educate" the poster got moderated. Trolls played here for years while many of us were banned for practically nothing. In recent years I became convinced that the majority of mods and admins were more clueless about gay rights than the average DUer. Yes, I said that and I stand by it.

This new system may work better than we think. If not, we're probably no worse off than before.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I really want to see you contribute more to DU. xchrom Dec 2011 #1
Agreed. William769 Dec 2011 #2
Did you vote to close the thread - Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #7
I said in my reply I voted to close it. xchrom Dec 2011 #13
My understanding in DU3 Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #17
A better description of what the LGBT forum should be for may be of help as well... Fearless Dec 2011 #18
Maybe I can be a bit clearer Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #21
There seems to be sensitivity right now to any perceived criticism of DU3. I'm taking a wait and see yardwork Dec 2011 #3
I agree that is why the thread was closed Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #4
It's not clear to me who made the decision to lock and how many were involved in the discussion. yardwork Dec 2011 #5
Totally agree. DURHAM D Dec 2011 #6
It takes a bit to get used to. Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #10
Right now I don't believe there are any. Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #8
HillWilliam is a great guy and I have total trust in him, but I don't know what is going on. yardwork Dec 2011 #9
When we went live at all hosts were removed. William769 Dec 2011 #11
Which is a bit odd Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #12
That's a good question! I think that the problem is that a lot is left up to descretion... Fearless Dec 2011 #14
It wasn't the old system that was broken. Pab Sungenis Dec 2011 #15
In theory yes, but... Fearless Dec 2011 #16
Discretion is the challenge Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #19
Indeed. For instance... Fearless Dec 2011 #20
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»What do we mean by "...»Reply #3