Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT

Fearless

(18,458 posts)

16. In theory yes, but...

Reply to Pab Sungenis (Reply #15)

Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:47 PM

Dec 2011

There is a "head host". The number 1 host has ultimate authority on who is a host and who isn't. It's helpful because there are more people per group "moderating", but when personal conflicts or personal issues come up, problems will arise.

We need to come together as a group and make meaningful choices without making it personal. At this point, looking around the group, I don't see it happening. I mean that I don't think we are capable of making a choice that will not hurt our members as a whole regardless of which people are chosen.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What do we mean by "All topics of interest to the LGBT community"? [View all] Ms. Toad Dec 2011 OP

I really want to see you contribute more to DU. xchrom Dec 2011 #1

Agreed. William769 Dec 2011 #2

Did you vote to close the thread - Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #7

I said in my reply I voted to close it. xchrom Dec 2011 #13

My understanding in DU3 Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #17

A better description of what the LGBT forum should be for may be of help as well... Fearless Dec 2011 #18

Maybe I can be a bit clearer Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #21

There seems to be sensitivity right now to any perceived criticism of DU3. I'm taking a wait and see yardwork Dec 2011 #3

I agree that is why the thread was closed Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #4

It's not clear to me who made the decision to lock and how many were involved in the discussion. yardwork Dec 2011 #5

Totally agree. DURHAM D Dec 2011 #6

It takes a bit to get used to. Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #10

Right now I don't believe there are any. Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #8

HillWilliam is a great guy and I have total trust in him, but I don't know what is going on. yardwork Dec 2011 #9

When we went live at all hosts were removed. William769 Dec 2011 #11

Which is a bit odd Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #12

That's a good question! I think that the problem is that a lot is left up to descretion... Fearless Dec 2011 #14

It wasn't the old system that was broken. Pab Sungenis Dec 2011 #15

In theory yes, but... Fearless Dec 2011 #16

Discretion is the challenge Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #19

Indeed. For instance... Fearless Dec 2011 #20