Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,595 posts)
17. My understanding in DU3
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 11:28 PM
Dec 2011

is that the rules are simple. A thread may be locked because it is "off topic." (And if you look in the locking message - that is what it says - it was locked because it was off topic.) That says to me that you started with the question, "Is the discussion of interest to the LGBT community?" (That is the purpose of the group).

The locking statement says that HillWilliam decided it was not of interest (and via the petition process that the rest of you reached the same conclusions - the answer is "No."

Based on the broad participation in the discussion (more than in any other thread) by the LGBT community, I was having difficulty understanding how you reached the conclusion that it was not of interest to the LGBT community. I asked for a clear statement of why the discussion is not of interest to the LGBT community, and have not been given an answer. (I have been given other explanations about why it might not be good to have this discussion now - but the thread was not locked for those reasons - and it isn't clear to me that they even could be within the rules of DU3.)

If my opinion is so different from the hosts about what is of interest to the LGBT community, then we really need some guidelines to help the hosts make decisions that aren't just going to make everyone angry because they seem so arbitrary.

On the other hand - if that question was never answered, perhaps it is just clearer guidelines that are needed as to the steps to go through before locking a thread for being "off topic."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I really want to see you contribute more to DU. xchrom Dec 2011 #1
Agreed. William769 Dec 2011 #2
Did you vote to close the thread - Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #7
I said in my reply I voted to close it. xchrom Dec 2011 #13
My understanding in DU3 Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #17
A better description of what the LGBT forum should be for may be of help as well... Fearless Dec 2011 #18
Maybe I can be a bit clearer Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #21
There seems to be sensitivity right now to any perceived criticism of DU3. I'm taking a wait and see yardwork Dec 2011 #3
I agree that is why the thread was closed Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #4
It's not clear to me who made the decision to lock and how many were involved in the discussion. yardwork Dec 2011 #5
Totally agree. DURHAM D Dec 2011 #6
It takes a bit to get used to. Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #10
Right now I don't believe there are any. Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #8
HillWilliam is a great guy and I have total trust in him, but I don't know what is going on. yardwork Dec 2011 #9
When we went live at all hosts were removed. William769 Dec 2011 #11
Which is a bit odd Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #12
That's a good question! I think that the problem is that a lot is left up to descretion... Fearless Dec 2011 #14
It wasn't the old system that was broken. Pab Sungenis Dec 2011 #15
In theory yes, but... Fearless Dec 2011 #16
Discretion is the challenge Ms. Toad Dec 2011 #19
Indeed. For instance... Fearless Dec 2011 #20
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»What do we mean by "...»Reply #17