Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 02:28 AM Dec 2011

Should HIV non-disclosure be a crime? [View all]

I recently had a very heated argument about this topic on another website and I wanted hear input on it. I understand HIV isn't a strictly gay issue, but as a gay man I wanted to hear gay perspective on it.

Based on my understanding of the law, if you know you are HIV positive and you don't tell your partner that before having sex with them you can be charged with a crime, even if you have a undetectable viral load, even if you use a condom and even if no actual transmission takes place.

Now I was initially supportive of this, but after hearing some arguments against it I'm not so sure. My thinking was that whether a person wants to have sex with someone who is HIV + should always be their choice. If you're positive you need to tell them and let them make the choice themselves. By not telling them you would be withholding life changing information from someone who could be making a life changing decision. I'm not cool with that so I'm hesitantly supportive of the law or at least the logic behind it.

However, the argument I heard seemed to amount to this. Sure lying about your HIV status is wrong, but a HIV + person isn't automatically responsible for another person practicing safe sex. If someone doesn't ask then it is wrong to force someone else to disclose. That you should only be responsible for yourself and getting infected was your fault for not asking and therefore not really caring. All this law does it create more stigma around being HIV + and further segregate them from the rest of society. The point of the law is to try and get the spread of HIV under control but it doesn't do that and actually only encourages people not to get tested (and hence be free of criminal liability) so they can keep having unprotected sex and not disclosing.

I'm not sure I'm 100% okay with that argument, but I can see the logic behind it. I like to think I'm sensitive to the already enormous social stigmatization that comes with being HIV +, but I came out of that argument feeling I was being insensitive to the plight of HIV + people.

I would really like some input on this.

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I see the argument as flawed FreeState Dec 2011 #1
Understood Kurska Dec 2011 #3
I would have to say yes... FreeState Dec 2011 #7
Only if we also criminalize non-disclosure of all other communicable diseases MNBrewer Dec 2011 #12
i agree that Hep-C should also be on this list. since its communicable and can be fatal La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #15
Remember the film, "Dressed to Kill", w/Angie Dickinson? {SPOILERS} closeupready Dec 2011 #16
its true undiagnosed syphilis can be. never knew herpes could be fatal La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #17
Herpes isn't fatal very often, of course, but in children or those with compromised immunity, it can closeupready Dec 2011 #18
I have to agree... w8liftinglady Dec 2011 #33
I used to be of the opinion that positive people LuvNewcastle Dec 2011 #2
I worked with a guy - a straight guy - who infected almost a dozen women and killed four cliffordu Dec 2011 #4
There was a man in the DFW area convicted of assault with a deadly weapon for purposely infecting tammywammy Dec 2011 #6
For sex acts? It is certainly unethical not to say... Fearless Dec 2011 #5
You know what really pisses me off? When someone thinks they can do whatever crappy thing dkf Dec 2011 #8
What problem would that solve and how? jberryhill Dec 2011 #9
I have an HIV + cousin who does not inform his sex partners justiceischeap Dec 2011 #10
why would he have to tell them if they are practicing safer sex? La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #23
Because, he like some others, aren't practicing safer sex. justiceischeap Dec 2011 #41
sorry, i wasn't clear on that. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #46
Yep, I see that as a problem too. Often laws are used for discrimination. The problem here, RKP5637 Dec 2011 #40
I've never understood the whole "bug chasers" gang justiceischeap Dec 2011 #42
Looking at this from a Social Work perspective Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2011 #11
As with everything, it depends, IMO. closeupready Dec 2011 #13
i think non-disclosure for having unsafe sex should be a crime La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #14
Makes for a great reason not to get tested MNBrewer Dec 2011 #19
what circumstances do you think it should be a crime? La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #20
I do not think it should be a crime under almost all circumstances MNBrewer Dec 2011 #21
as far as this goes, i did describe a very limited circumstance La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #22
There should be at least as much culpability in not asking as in not disclosing MNBrewer Dec 2011 #24
the culpability is not the same, when one knows one has an communicable disease La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #25
We at least agree on this MNBrewer Dec 2011 #26
as i said most people are not sociopathic. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #28
Please note that I'm not saying that people don't have the responsibility of honestly informing MNBrewer Dec 2011 #31
imagine a scenario where i am married to my husband and want to conceive a baby La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #32
In the case of a married couple, I think the circumstances of the relationship do closeupready Dec 2011 #34
We don't require disclosure of any other infectious disease, so why HIV? yardwork Dec 2011 #27
i would say that its because hiv is one of the few diseases that La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #29
In order to stigmatize it and punish people who have it. MNBrewer Dec 2011 #30
First, that is not illegal in every state, only in some. beyurslf Dec 2011 #35
i think you mean.. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #36
Yes thank you. beyurslf Dec 2011 #37
also i agree w. you La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #38
I firmly believe that there should be a law/s requiring disclosure any infectious disease more uriel1972 Dec 2011 #39
why would you have to disclose if you are practicing safer sex? La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #44
Brokewn condoms for a start. nt. uriel1972 Dec 2011 #47
yes, but it unfairly penalizes someone who knows they have hiv vs someone who carries it but doesnt La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #48
Your views are not universally held amongst medical professionals, from what I know. closeupready Dec 2011 #49
I'm not talking about branding people, uriel1972 Dec 2011 #50
yes, but ethicality and legality are different issues La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2011 #52
OK we can probably get away with no new laws uriel1972 Dec 2011 #53
Well I do hope you protect your health, use condoms and always practice safer sex. closeupready Dec 2011 #54
I would if I get the oppurtunity uriel1972 Dec 2011 #56
Well, you really are talking about one side of the same coin I'm talking about. closeupready Dec 2011 #55
My worry is that laws like that lead to a decreased number of people getting tested. Lyric Dec 2011 #43
I don't know. Interesting debate. nt ZombieHorde Dec 2011 #45
Very interesting Kurska Dec 2011 #51
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Should HIV non-disclosure...»Reply #0