Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Women's Rights & Issues

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)

3. +1

Reply to Ilsa (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:56 AM

Feb 2012

That was my thought as well. That way they can hurt women and disproportionately hurt the poor at the same time. Pretty much their two favorite activities.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Regarding Ultrasounds: This is no way near being over, MANY battles in many states still to fight [View all] Tx4obama Feb 2012 OP

I was wondering if they purposely over reached on invasive ultrasound? Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #1

I think they are making the cost Ilsa Feb 2012 #2

+1 JoeyT Feb 2012 #3

Yes, it's about cost first. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #4