Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Women's Rights & Issues

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)

11. both points hit the nail on the head

Reply to Novara (Reply #10)

Sat Jun 6, 2015, 03:18 PM

Jun 2015

we should be fighting for expanded access to birth control, sex education and family planning (including abortion), but framing it in the context of doing so to reduce the abortion rate plays into the anti-choice argument that there are too many abortions happening.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

�I wish we talked about �choices� instead of �choice�� [View all] Novara Jun 2015 OP

K&R marym625 Jun 2015 #1

EXACTLY! Novara Jun 2015 #2

absolutely marym625 Jun 2015 #3

You're right about creep Novara Jun 2015 #4

yep marym625 Jun 2015 #7

i once posted in gd about my issue with "rare" being used in the context of abortion fizzgig Jun 2015 #5

exactly! marym625 Jun 2015 #6

i use "parasite" in that context fizzgig Jun 2015 #8

amen to that! marym625 Jun 2015 #9

Yes, the point about value judgments is often glossed over or ignored Novara Jun 2015 #10

both points hit the nail on the head fizzgig Jun 2015 #11

Exactly. Novara Jun 2015 #12