Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Women's Rights & Issues
In reply to the discussion: SOP conversation [View all]kdmorris
(5,649 posts)48. As far as "protected" I think we already are
Once Women's Rights and Issues became a group and not a forum, the hosts are now the ones that determine the rules. At the top of the group it says:
This is a group, not a forum. Groups often serve as safe havens for members who share similar interests and viewpoints. Individuals who post messages contrary to a particular group's stated purpose can be excluded from posting in that group. For detailed information about this group and its purpose, click here.
So, really... what we come up with for the SOP will determine how "protected" we are. At that is my understanding of it.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Re: "Protected group." Before we ask to become a protected group, let's talk about what this means.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#1
I suggest that we talk about the SoP now and table the discussion on protected status.
Gormy Cuss
Feb 2012
#4
As I said in another thread, I prefer to participate in groups that are open to everybody.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#8
Yeah. I think that should be against community standards on DU. I alerted on that post, btw.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#11
Somebody who calls prochoice people pro-deathers is inherently not interested in women's rights.
Gormy Cuss
Feb 2012
#41
I agree with you about each of those issues, but I don't think it's possible to spell it all out.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#50
Again, I would prefer to leave this to the discretion of the hosts within a broad, simple SoP.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#51
I think I understand what you're getting at, and here's how I feel about it.
Gormy Cuss
Feb 2012
#61