Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Women's Rights & Issues

In reply to the discussion: SOP conversation [View all]

MH1

(19,163 posts)
55. My 2 cents. A little clarification / specificity.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:14 AM
Feb 2012

Ok I don't post here very much, but I am very interested in seeing this group remain a functional, worthwhile place for discussion of the topic of women's rights. That means avoiding some of the issues that have seemed to plague *cough* other groups in DU.

For one thing, this group (in my view and preference), should be primarily about women's RIGHTS, which are under assault pretty much everywhere, and which have never, in most places and certainly not in the U.S., reached parity with the rights of men (men as in male human beings, not the allegedly generalized 'men' which arguably doesn't really include women when rights are the topic).

The U.S. never ratified the Equal Rights Amendment, remember? That matters. That it matters has been driven home full force this week with the sordid spectacles we've seen, on Capitol Hill with the hearing farce about birth control, and the VA law that a raped woman will be raped yet again by the state, or bear her rapist's child. Most here probably remember the Catholic nun who was disciplined for (if I remember the details correctly) allowing a woman who was dying with the dying fetus inside her to have an abortion, when there was nearly 0 (and doctors will never say absolutely 0) chance of the fetus surviving; both would surely die if the fetus were not aborted. But in the Catholic Church's view, A WOMAN HAS NO RIGHT TO LIFE. How stark is that?

There are tons of issues out there that affect women. Many can be tied in to a political discussion of women's rights. For example, the failure to protect women from environmental toxins that they are exposed to at a higher rate than men, or the failure of health care system to adequately differentiate appropriate treatments for women vs. men.

There's a lot of issues that might be highly contentious, where "freedom" might potentially conflict with exploitation. (Porn, anyone?)

Then there are issues of overlap with other groups. There are the rights of women as opposed to the rights of men in our patriarchal society. Then what about the issues of lesbian or trans-gendered women?

What I would hope to see from this group is an emphasis on discussion of women's rights that are relevant to any woman walking down the street. Rights that impact her ability to live her life to its fullest, but which might be threatened because she is a woman. NOT issues that might come up because she is a lesbian or transgendered woman (if those need a group, it should be a different group, imo. But those women will also suffer for the rights issues that I'm saying DO belong here.) And not things that are really not political issues, such as "why did Clairol discontinue my shade of hair color" or stuff like that. Well I hope that last example isn't too bizarre, but just trying to give an example of a non-political, non rights-based issue that probably wouldn't belong in this group.

Also, I would request that it be considered 'protected' in the sense that speech decrying the abuse of women - even if poorly stated and possibly insensitive to other cultures - should be protected. Sure, if I make a broad brush accusation in a way that unfairly tars a particular culture, call me on it and explain why I'm wrong. But I think if we are going to discuss the abuse of women, the attitudes against women that result in women being treated as property, sometimes an inartful, 'culturally insensitive' thing might slip out. But you know what? After this last week in the war on women, I'm a little less interested in being "culturally sensitive", and a lot more interested in what the f*** do we do to stop these assholes?

Well I guess that about covers it. I expect my voice to be small here because I don't post much, but thought I'd throw it out there for consideration. It's just my opinion. Overall I think this group has been doing a pretty good job, so maybe you don't need to change anything anyway.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SOP conversation [View all] La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 OP
Re: "Protected group." Before we ask to become a protected group, let's talk about what this means. yardwork Feb 2012 #1
really good point La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #2
I'm not sure what it means. You go first. yardwork Feb 2012 #3
i already said i have no idea what that would mean for du3 La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #5
Agreed obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #6
yes, i think once we sort out SOP La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #7
Has anyone EVER been TOS'd or PPRd from DU for sexism or misogyny? Remember Me Feb 2012 #13
You mean since you joined DU last July? yardwork Feb 2012 #14
EVEr is what I said, and what I mean Remember Me Feb 2012 #15
yes, many times on DU2 and quite a few here as well maddezmom Feb 2012 #16
Well that's comforing because I've not seen Remember Me Feb 2012 #28
I know of at least 5 that were PPR'd from DU3 maddezmom Feb 2012 #29
Yes. laconicsax Feb 2012 #38
I am really glad to hear it Remember Me Feb 2012 #45
that looks good to me maddezmom Feb 2012 #17
Thanks! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #18
That sounds great Irishonly Feb 2012 #47
I suggest that we talk about the SoP now and table the discussion on protected status. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #4
As I said in another thread, I prefer to participate in groups that are open to everybody. yardwork Feb 2012 #8
how about someone who is against abortion in all cases La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #9
Yeah. I think that should be against community standards on DU. I alerted on that post, btw. yardwork Feb 2012 #11
as a host... I think we would just agree to kick them out OKNancy Feb 2012 #23
That would certainly be the best recourse obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #25
hell yes... I told Gormy OKNancy Feb 2012 #26
Uh oh obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #27
note to self--retrieve spiked heels from closet, to be used as needed niyad Feb 2012 #53
agree and hope all the hosts feel the same way maddezmom Feb 2012 #30
I agree. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #40
No and that should probably be spelled out in the SOP n/t kdmorris Feb 2012 #32
Somebody who calls prochoice people pro-deathers is inherently not interested in women's rights. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #41
This obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #44
Mind meld! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #10
That's because we're socks. /nt yardwork Feb 2012 #12
do you match? my socks almost never do La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #19
LOL! Where do those socks go???! yardwork Feb 2012 #20
I hope so obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #21
I don't think we need to be "protected" OKNancy Feb 2012 #22
I say yes to anything that is a woman's/women's issue obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #24
EVERY issue is a women's issue niyad Feb 2012 #54
I agree with Nancy about everything she said in that post. yardwork Feb 2012 #49
The SOP could always use clarification kdmorris Feb 2012 #31
Good post, kd obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #33
I agree with you about each of those issues, but I don't think it's possible to spell it all out. yardwork Feb 2012 #50
Oh, I agree with that... kdmorris Feb 2012 #52
what I'd like to see added along with all the other great suggestions maddezmom Feb 2012 #34
Cosign with the maddez on this obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #36
Two thumbs up... Yep kdmorris Feb 2012 #39
I like the idea of a bullet-point list of do's and don'ts justiceischeap Feb 2012 #35
Great idea. Lisa D Feb 2012 #37
Again, I would prefer to leave this to the discretion of the hosts within a broad, simple SoP. yardwork Feb 2012 #51
My 2 cents: laconicsax Feb 2012 #42
Thanks laconicsax - great point. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #43
yes, i would like to add that to the SOP La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #46
As far as "protected" I think we already are kdmorris Feb 2012 #48
My 2 cents. A little clarification / specificity. MH1 Feb 2012 #55
I have a question Lisa D Feb 2012 #56
Sure, let me put it another way. MH1 Feb 2012 #57
I think I understand what you're getting at, and here's how I feel about it. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #61
Thank you for elaborating. Lisa D Feb 2012 #62
i completely and absolutely disagree La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #58
Thank you, Lioness obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #59
sorry, I think my post was not clear enough, if that's how you read it. MH1 Feb 2012 #60
I'm going to lock this and direct people to post comments and suggestion in the Current SoP thread. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #63
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»SOP conversation»Reply #55