Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Why Syzygy

(18,928 posts)
12. Seriously?
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:27 PM
Apr 2012

Nothing to back that up?



A spin-off of Fuller's dome-design conceptualization was the Buckminster Ball, which was the official FIFA approved design for footballs (association football), from their introduction at the 1970 World Cup until recently. The design was a truncated icosahedron – essentially a "Geodesic Sphere", consisting of 12 pentagonal and 20 hexagonal panels. This was used continuously for 34 years until replaced by the 14-panel Teamgeist for the 2006 World Cup.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller#Practical_achievements


I would call that "designed".

If you don't, why would anyone care? Is there a purpose to this particular contrariness?
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Bucky Balls Could Double ...»Reply #12