Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Health

(26,549 posts)

7. First, I already covered that fructose in HFCS is different

Tue May 15, 2012, 09:30 PM

May 2012

Second, you copy exactly the same errors I talk about above.

Fructose is associated with gout, insulin intolerance, weight gain, IBS and other dietary problems.

Such studies used 100% fructose. Hey look! It's lacking the control I was talking about.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Someday, anti-HFCS people will learn HFCS isn't fructose. jeff47 May 2012 #1

Just for my information ... rog May 2012 #2

I'm pro-science. I'm neutral on HFCS. jeff47 May 2012 #3

Is this the study you're looking for? rog May 2012 #6

No, there's some problems with their conclusions jeff47 May 2012 #8

How could I guess ... rog May 2012 #9

If I told you the sky was blue jeff47 May 2012 #11

There are mistakes in what you say intaglio May 2012 #5

First, I already covered that fructose in HFCS is different jeff47 May 2012 #7

The problem with 100% fructose jeff47 May 2012 #12

Why do you need a lesson in digestion? intaglio May 2012 #13

The claims of health damage are not based on absorption rate. jeff47 May 2012 #14

Bait and switch intaglio May 2012 #15

So if rats eat high fructose yogurt NV Whino May 2012 #4