Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
4. The real problem
Tue May 22, 2012, 10:42 AM
May 2012

is the overreaction to a spike in PSA, and the rush to extreme treatment measures at early signs of a problem. That's what has, ironically, made not being tested and not knowing if you have a problem healthier on average.

Testing certainly doesn't have to be done every year for everyone starting at 50, though closer monitoring for those with a patrilineal history of prostate cancer is prudent. If a PSA spike is detected, closer and more frequent monitoring is warranted, but rushing to radiation treatment or removal at that point is not usually wise. Prostate cancer tends to be slow to progress and non-aggressive. Most men who get it will die of something else first, even if it is not treated.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»All Routine PSA Tests For...»Reply #4