Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unc70

(6,507 posts)
12. About biopsy, there is research
Wed May 23, 2012, 02:07 AM
May 2012

A prostate biopsy (usually 12 samples) can give a lot of information and help determine the best course of treatment for a given patient. But it has limits. We know far less about types of prostate cancers than we do for many others like breast cancer.

Johns Hopkins has been studying watchful waiting following biopsy for patients with certain characteristics considered lower risk. It is too early to be sure about outcomes. This is not the same as not screening.

Another study showed that significantly better 10-year survival rates for those with surgery.

Since PSA screening is only been around for about 20 years and nerve conserving surgery became widely available even later, things are quite the muddle.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»All Routine PSA Tests For...»Reply #12