Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
15. I have done that, and considered what you say, and I still think you are wrong.
Wed May 23, 2012, 07:54 AM
May 2012

The argument is not that nobody will be saved by surveillance, the argument is that many more will be harmed by it, not to mention the expense. I have lost one parent and two younger siblings to cancer, and have another with a positive prostate diagnosis, and I can still assure you that you won't get me near any of that "treatment" unless it appears much more efficacious than what I have seen with them. But I'm glad it worked out well for you.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»All Routine PSA Tests For...»Reply #15