Health

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)

41. What on Earth are you talking about?

Sun Jun 10, 2012, 04:34 AM

Jun 2012

The closest you've come to making a relevant, on-topic comment in this thread is your first comment and even then it was only tangentially related to the OP. Since then, each of your posts has been one sad attempt after another to steer the conversation away from the OP and your refuted claims.

Go ahead, prove me wrong. Show that you've been consistently making on-topic posts. Show that you haven't consistently tried to change the subject away from your inability to counter fact-based rebuttals. Show that the article you posted in #11 is relevant to the OP or this subthread up to that point. Show that since making that post, you haven't engaged in an endless series of ad hominem comments.

By all means, prove me wrong.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Opting out of vaccinations could get tougher in California [View all] alp227 Jun 2012 OP

I wonder if part of the problem is trying to "Vaccinize" everything including what used to be villager Jun 2012 #1

+1000!!! FirstLight Jun 2012 #2

Yeah, because it's a great thing to push anti-science nonsense. HuckleB Jun 2012 #16

Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #18

And once again, science is labeled "Big Pharma." HuckleB Jun 2012 #19

To quote a great TV show... TheMightyFavog Jun 2012 #37

There was morbidity and mortality associated with these illnesses cbayer Jun 2012 #3

Sure, if you don't mind hundreds of children dying every year. TheWraith Jun 2012 #5

What problem? The naturalistic fallacy? alp227 Jun 2012 #6

Those childhood diseases are far from harmless. MineralMan Jun 2012 #7

I don't remember a single kid dying from chicken pox or mumps, actually villager Jun 2012 #9

It's rare, but happens. laconicsax Jun 2012 #10

"Chickenpox Vaccine Loses Effectiveness" villager Jun 2012 #11

Your point is what? laconicsax Jun 2012 #12

I'd respond, but since you're good at putting words in my mouth villager Jun 2012 #20

What words were "put in your mouth?" HuckleB Jun 2012 #22

Hey, HuckleB -- it turns out, I wasn't talking to you! villager Jun 2012 #24

It turns out you made a claim you can't support. HuckleB Jun 2012 #27

Please list what I've made up and what words I've put in your mouth. laconicsax Jun 2012 #25

Please read the article I posted and respond to that, instead of lapsing into "insult mode" villager Jun 2012 #28

The article you posted has zero relevance to the OP or the rest of this thread. laconicsax Jun 2012 #36

Ah -- so you don't read the actual posts (but we knew that), preferring instead your snarky drivel villager Jun 2012 #40

What on Earth are you talking about? laconicsax Jun 2012 #41

Who's "we?" HuckleB Jun 2012 #42

I remember a "statistics teacher" who played the same game. n/t laconicsax Jun 2012 #45

A kid in a neighboring town of mine died from chicken pox. trotsky Jun 2012 #13

Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #34

Well, I do remember one. MineralMan Jun 2012 #17

What a lovely, progressive attitude. laconicsax Jun 2012 #8

+1 HuckleB Jun 2012 #14

That sounds ominously similar to sadge-virgo Jun 2012 #57

There's a notable difference: laconicsax Jun 2012 #64

What? HuckleB Jun 2012 #15

Good. TheWraith Jun 2012 #4

And yet hearsay and anecdotage dominate the "vaccinate for everything" side of the debate here, too villager Jun 2012 #21

Nope. HuckleB Jun 2012 #23

Oh, I'm sorry. When was the last time your kids had Polio? TheWraith Jun 2012 #26

Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #29

Nope. HuckleB Jun 2012 #30

Any law to shoot people up will not go down nicely. Fascism pure and simple. caesars things Jun 2012 #31

Putting others at risk because one believes in fairy tales is a good way to describe fascism, IMO. HuckleB Jun 2012 #32

That is very dangerous thinking, my friend. caesars things Jun 2012 #33

Yes, anti-vaccine fairy tales are dangerous. HuckleB Jun 2012 #35

They should have been praying that Skinner wouldn't notice them. laconicsax Jun 2012 #38

Interestingly, I played with puppets with my six-year-old this afternoon. HuckleB Jun 2012 #39

I'm ready to turn this thread back to the scientific mode Celebration Jun 2012 #43

The safety is independently verified through more than one area of research. laconicsax Jun 2012 #46

not what I was looking for Celebration Jun 2012 #47

You mean the studies that show the individual vaccines are safe? laconicsax Jun 2012 #48

my first preference Celebration Jun 2012 #49

That's a nice preference except for the fact that it would be highly unethical. laconicsax Jun 2012 #50

Please prove your last assertion. HuckleB Jun 2012 #51

huh! Celebration Jun 2012 #52

So you've made assertions you can't support. HuckleB Jun 2012 #53

No, that's not what they said. laconicsax Jun 2012 #54

Oh, ok. HuckleB Jun 2012 #55

I'll answer Celebration Jun 2012 #56

In other words, you made a claim that you can't support. HuckleB Jun 2012 #58

tit for tat Celebration Jun 2012 #60

Nice confession. HuckleB Jun 2012 #61

No problem Celebration Jun 2012 #65

I'm certain that you haven't connected the dots. HuckleB Jun 2012 #66

Righto Celebration Jun 2012 #67

Like I wrote, you haven't connected the dots. HuckleB Jun 2012 #68

And you refuse to provide the dots Celebration Jun 2012 #71

I'm not the one who needs to provide proof of anything. HuckleB Jun 2012 #72

The Problem With Dr Bob's Alternative Vaccine Schedule HuckleB Jun 2012 #44

New Book: Your Baby’s Best Shot: Why Vaccines Are Safe and Save Lives HuckleB Jun 2012 #59

Child Immunization Schedule: Why Is It Like That? HuckleB Jun 2012 #62

Anti-Vaccine Rhetoric: When Pro-Safe Is Pro-Misinformation HuckleB Jun 2012 #63

New vaccine-scheduling study deals blow to safety fears HuckleB Jun 2012 #69

Vaccine studies: Examine the evidence HuckleB Jun 2012 #70