Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tumbulu

(6,609 posts)
5. Yes there are and since there have been no public studies
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 12:05 PM
Oct 2012

of the safety of the products of this technology we are left in the dark.

Criticisms of this one test are ridiculous. Where are the toxicity studies performed by the companies putting these seeds out? If they have the gaul to criticise the methods, then let's see their own internal tests.

They made the outrageous claim that they are the same and do not require any safety peer reviewed safety testing.

If we can get Prop 37 passed in CA, it will make a huge difference. Labeling is the least we can do, they should have never been allowed out in the environment without being thoroughly tested.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Antivaccine versus anti-G...»Reply #5