Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Health

(35,773 posts)

8. Ah, yes, you want a negative proven before anything can be done.

Mon Oct 1, 2012, 12:33 PM

Oct 2012

Thanks you for offering up the usual non-science response. Oh, and are you saying Europe does not use GMO products? Really?

Good day.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Antivaccine versus anti-GMO: Different goals, same methods [View all] HuckleB Oct 2012 OP

I think there are many, many problem with GMO foods - hedgehog Oct 2012 #1

It's not that simple. HuckleB Oct 2012 #2

From the article you linked to: hedgehog Oct 2012 #3

I'm not going to play games. HuckleB Oct 2012 #7

Yes there are and since there have been no public studies Tumbulu Oct 2012 #5

Bzzt. Wrong. HuckleB Oct 2012 #17

Wakefield was a fraud, a quack and vaccines save billions of lives graham4anything Oct 2012 #4

This is a ridiculous argument Tumbulu Oct 2012 #6

Ah, yes, you want a negative proven before anything can be done. HuckleB Oct 2012 #8

It is never a good day when scientists shirk professional duty Tumbulu Oct 2012 #10

You keep making claims, but you don't support them with science. HuckleB Oct 2012 #11

No, I keep waiting to see Tumbulu Oct 2012 #12

No, you keep making claims without support. HuckleB Oct 2012 #13

PS: HuckleB Oct 2012 #14

Is this silly blog link a joke? Tumbulu Oct 2012 #15

You're not waiting for anything. HuckleB Oct 2012 #16