Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Health

Celebration

(15,812 posts)

9. if they can make money they are tested right away

Reply to Warpy (Reply #8)

Sun Feb 3, 2013, 06:43 PM

Feb 2013

and the outcome measures configured in such a way as to almost guarantee success.

If they don't make money, there is no incentive to test them. So maybe yes, maybe no, and later rather than sooner.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Boy With a Thorn in His Joints [View all] elleng Feb 2013 OP

Thank you, Ellen libodem Feb 2013 #1

Read the entire article, thank you for this.... especially liked the following: 2on2u Feb 2013 #2

Yes. Thanks for the excerpt. elleng Feb 2013 #3

Yeah, it's hard trying to get the most important stuff in 4 pgrfs.... I am sending this 2on2u Feb 2013 #4

Great. elleng Feb 2013 #5

The problem with RA and a lot of other immune system diseases Warpy Feb 2013 #6

sensible comment on the article Celebration Feb 2013 #7

When they pile up, they are tested. Warpy Feb 2013 #8

if they can make money they are tested right away Celebration Feb 2013 #9

Wrong. NIH grants aren't awarded to people trying to make a bundle. Warpy Feb 2013 #10

big enough issue Celebration Feb 2013 #11