Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
10. In other studies, the sham group responded while the acupuncture did not.
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 07:10 PM
Jan 2012

These are small studies, and they're results are only worthy in terms of moving study forward. They are almost meaningless. That was noted in the OP I offered earlier today.

This explains this at length:

Are Most Medical Studies Wrong?
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/are-most-medical-studies-wrong/

More studies on this matter... just as examples of the contradicting small studies that make this whole discussion nearly pointless:

Sham acupuncture is better than "true" acupuncture
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2008/04/sham_acupuncture_is_better_than_true_acu.php

Acupuncture for Pain No Better Than Placebo -- And Not Without Harm, Study Finds
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110324104147.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»First biological proof fo...»Reply #10