Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

American History

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ellisonz

(27,776 posts)
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 06:37 PM Mar 2012

New Look at an Old Memo Casts More Doubt on Rehnquist [View all]

By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: March 19, 2012

WASHINGTON — In 1952, a young Supreme Court clerk wrote a memorandum that would come to haunt him.

The court was considering Brown v. Board of Education, the great school desegregation case. The question for the justices was whether to overrule Plessy v. Ferguson, the 1896 decision that said “separate but equal” facilities were constitutional.

The memo, prepared for Justice Robert H. Jackson, was written in the first person and bore the clerk’s initials — “WHR,” for William H. Rehnquist.

“I realize it is an unpopular and unhumanitarian position, for which I have been excoriated by ‘liberal’ colleagues,” Mr. Rehnquist wrote, “but I think Plessy v. Ferguson was right and should be reaffirmed.”

NY Times Story


If true, this really taints whatever positive legacy Rehnquist may have had. He believed and segregation and lied about his advocacy thereof. Also, the theft of Justice Frankfurters papers from the Library of Congress smells like ratfucker cover-up.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»American History»New Look at an Old Memo C...»Reply #0