Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lionel Mandrake

(4,076 posts)
11. I agree
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 11:55 AM
Aug 2014

that the main verb is "saw" and that "I" is the subject of the sentence.

I tend to agree that "it happen" is an object clause, but other interpretations are possible.

I doubt that the verb "happen" is a past subjunctive, but you may be right about that as well. As Igel pointed out in post #5, your explanation depends on your theory. Traditional grammar and Chomskyan transformational grammar, for example, may yield different interpretations of "I saw it happen".

Looks like "it happen" is the object of the verb "saw". Scuba Aug 2014 #1
It does look that way. Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #2
The mood could be sad, happy, disappointed - depends on what "it" was. Scuba Aug 2014 #3
Now that's funny. Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #4
Your explanation depends on your theory. Igel Aug 2014 #5
Thank you for the scholarly reply, but Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #6
I saw it happen Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #7
It's true that the subject or object of a sentence can be a clause, Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #9
The main verb is "saw" Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #10
I agree Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #11
Well, I come from the school of traditional grammar Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #12
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Languages and Linguistics»Can anyone explain the sy...»Reply #11