Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lionel Mandrake

(4,076 posts)
7. I would argue a few points, including "arguably".
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 02:02 PM
Aug 2014

Syntactically it's clear that "would" is the past tense of "will", and similarly for the other pairs of modals. Historically, it's clear that "would" was the past tense of "will", etc. But semantically, the meaning of "I would like to eat now" is in the present, not the past.

Modals in English and German are similar, except that in German they have infinitives and participles. English "I must" corresponds to German "ich musste", which is the past tense of "ich muss". This suggests that English "must" should be considered past tense.

Wie sagt man auf Deutsch: "I knew they would go"? (I'm wondering how similar the English and German versions are.)

Syntactically English has no future tense. Future meaning in English is always expressed paraphrastically: I'm going to eat, I will eat, I'm about to eat, etc.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Languages and Linguistics»vestiges of gender and ca...»Reply #7