Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
In reply to the discussion: For once I agree with Rand Paul. I also don't think Loretta Lynch should be Attorney General [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)29. I thought class wars began thousands of years ago, and almost always with government being of the
rich people, by the rich people and for the rich people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For once I agree with Rand Paul. I also don't think Loretta Lynch should be Attorney General [View all]
danriker
Feb 2015
OP
She sounds like another of Pres Obama's disappointing appointees. Not a progressive
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#5
Their job is to overrule Congress if appropriate. That's a big part of what the SCOTUS is for.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#16
Work without pay sure sounds like "involuntary servitude", but maybe that's just me.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#21
I thought class wars began thousands of years ago, and almost always with government being of the
merrily
Feb 2015
#29
I don't support legalization of marijuana, either, unless you release ALL black and brown men
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2015
#13
I don't give a fuck about Rand Paul or what he thinks. As long as he's
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2015
#23
"Case closed!" Not really, you're using a associational and/or genetic fallacy
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#24
There is nothing you can tell me, no article you can post, or write that would EVER lead me to
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2015
#25
Pointing out that a racist is correct on *one* subject isn't giving them a character reference
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#32
If Paul said that 2+2=4, those who pointed out that he was correct in that instance would be...
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#33
Our interlocutor seems bent on avoiding actually discussing what Riker brought up
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#34