Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
In reply to the discussion: For once I agree with Rand Paul. I also don't think Loretta Lynch should be Attorney General [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)32. Pointing out that a racist is correct on *one* subject isn't giving them a character reference
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For once I agree with Rand Paul. I also don't think Loretta Lynch should be Attorney General [View all]
danriker
Feb 2015
OP
She sounds like another of Pres Obama's disappointing appointees. Not a progressive
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#5
Their job is to overrule Congress if appropriate. That's a big part of what the SCOTUS is for.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#16
Work without pay sure sounds like "involuntary servitude", but maybe that's just me.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#21
I thought class wars began thousands of years ago, and almost always with government being of the
merrily
Feb 2015
#29
I don't support legalization of marijuana, either, unless you release ALL black and brown men
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2015
#13
I don't give a fuck about Rand Paul or what he thinks. As long as he's
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2015
#23
"Case closed!" Not really, you're using a associational and/or genetic fallacy
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#24
There is nothing you can tell me, no article you can post, or write that would EVER lead me to
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2015
#25
Pointing out that a racist is correct on *one* subject isn't giving them a character reference
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#32
If Paul said that 2+2=4, those who pointed out that he was correct in that instance would be...
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#33
Our interlocutor seems bent on avoiding actually discussing what Riker brought up
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#34