Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Agreed. Glassunion Jan 2013 #1
I have... Puha Ekapi Jan 2013 #2
what Glassunion and the other guys said gejohnston Jan 2013 #3
every gun buyer should be checked overthehillvet Jan 2013 #4
that has to do with medical privacy laws of each state gejohnston Jan 2013 #8
We have a way Dog Gone at Penigma Jan 2013 #15
what evidence is this? gejohnston Jan 2013 #18
there is an entire area of law being practiced that takes advantage of how easy it is Dog Gone at Penigma Jan 2013 #36
some countries, non violent felons don't lose them at all gejohnston Jan 2013 #40
Great ideas overthehillvet Jan 2013 #19
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #49
Source? AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #53
no problem with this Duckhunter935 Jan 2013 #5
Good n/t sarisataka Jan 2013 #6
Rec'd Kaleva Jan 2013 #7
Not a bad idea I suppose. ileus Jan 2013 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Ashgrey77 Jan 2013 #10
You can have that one sylvi Jan 2013 #11
as long as the records are kept confidential backwoodsbob Jan 2013 #12
what is confidential in the age of the internet? anonymus has proved this to be false, haven't they? Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2013 #45
Open NICS to private sellers and require the check. aikoaiko Jan 2013 #13
I favor the Ca system for checking private sales. overthehillvet Jan 2013 #21
Agreed, as long as there is a safe-harbor provision for sellers. friendly_iconoclast Jan 2013 #51
Good. I hope he gets plenty of support. Dog Gone at Penigma Jan 2013 #14
Agree. Been advocated in the Gungeon for years. nt Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #16
What's he got against Annie Oakley? Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #17
Obviously a misogynist holdencaufield Jan 2013 #22
Agreed. LP2K12 Jan 2013 #20
just gotta add this overthehillvet Jan 2013 #23
Just curious how it would work... Bay Boy Jan 2013 #24
Done at the gun store ... Straw Man Jan 2013 #25
I can go for that overthehillvet Jan 2013 #27
States historical concealed carry prohibitions jimmy the one Jan 2013 #28
nope overthehillvet Jan 2013 #30
picayune jimmy the one Jan 2013 #31
They should be protected by the firearm owners protection act of 1986 if simply passing through. cmclane28 Jan 2013 #33
Absolutely correct that each state can set their own concealed laws cmclane28 Jan 2013 #34
All of those states are now shall-issue states. N/T GreenStormCloud Jan 2013 #50
Does anyone know what Jenoch Jan 2013 #26
About 20 years before Louis Armstrong lit up a fatty at the Apollo. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #29
Which of the last 2 years of mass shootings would this have prevented? AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #32
Jared Loughner Dog Gone at Penigma Jan 2013 #37
Loughner didn't buy his guns at a gun show. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #43
Also, he was never formally adjudged incompetent. friendly_iconoclast Jan 2013 #52
Gun owner not opposed cmclane28 Jan 2013 #35
Are you aware of what the NRA has done? Dog Gone at Penigma Jan 2013 #38
murder rates by states jimmy the one Jan 2013 #39
I think what the NRA got instituted there is bad AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #44
Baloney Dog Gone at Penigma Jan 2013 #46
fascinating gejohnston Jan 2013 #47
I didn't say the NRA position was reasonable or more reasonable. I said it was the opposite. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #48
accomplice to 1st deg murder, not the shooter jimmy the one Jan 2013 #41
don't care for due process much? gejohnston Jan 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Lawmaker wants checks on ...»Reply #20