Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Lawmaker wants checks on private gun sales [View all]Straw Man
(6,957 posts)25. Done at the gun store ...
... FFL licensee's place of business, whatever it may be: pawnshop, gunsmith's shop, etc. Police don't do NICS checks: not their job. In my experience, FFLs charge anywhere from $20 to $35, but I've heard of much higher charges. There is no mandated fee schedule for this -- it's whatever the FFL feels like charging.
Friend selling to friend would, of course, be very hard to detect, but then any illegal sale -- whether guns, drugs, or whatever -- is hard to detect without undercover operations.
I'm in favor of this. In the interest of compromise, may we then have 50-state concealed-carry reciprocity?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
there is an entire area of law being practiced that takes advantage of how easy it is
Dog Gone at Penigma
Jan 2013
#36
what is confidential in the age of the internet? anonymus has proved this to be false, haven't they?
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2013
#45
They should be protected by the firearm owners protection act of 1986 if simply passing through.
cmclane28
Jan 2013
#33
I didn't say the NRA position was reasonable or more reasonable. I said it was the opposite.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2013
#48