Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thucythucy

(9,164 posts)
92. It's late, and I'm getting a little bleary here.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 01:13 AM
Jan 2013

But going to the website to which you link, I could find NO information, that is recent information, on contributors. However, I did get this list of donors from 2004-2005. (It appears 2010, 2012 figures were not available, but like I say, maybe I'm missing something). In any case, the list below seems to show that their funding has come from more than one source:

Contrib Occupation Date Amount
WOLKOWITZ, MICHAEL
HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON, NY 10706 MJM CREATIVE SERVICES INC./PRODUCER 05/30/03 $5,000
ORDWAY, GILMAN
WILSON, WY 83014 SELF EMPLOYED/RANCHER/RESORT OWNER 07/23/03 $5,000
FIORDELLISI, ANGELINA
NEW YORK, NY 10128 CHERRY LANE THEATER/ARTISTIC DIRECT 11/02/04 $5,000
MARSHALL, FRANK
SANTA MONICA, CA 90410 10/22/04 $5,000
PALEVSKY, MAX
LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 SELF/INVESTOR 10/26/04 $5,000
WILLIAMS, MATT
NEW YORK, NY 10128 WIND DANCER PRODUCTION GROUP/PRODUC 11/02/04 $5,000
PARKER, DIANE
THOMASVILLE, GA 31799 SELF/RETAIL 08/19/04 $3,750
HOLINER, HOPE
HASTINGS ON HUDSON, NY 10706 10/26/04 $3,500
BERMAN, CAROL
WASHINGTON, DC 20007 RETIRED 10/01/04 $2,500
SEGAL, PHYLLIS
BOSTON, MA 02116 ADR ASSOCIATES/MEDIATOR AND ARBITRA 10/01/04 $2,500
SCHOENKE, NANCY
GAITHERSBURG, MD 20882 10/01/04 $2,500
DEAN, WILLIAM
GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 08/05/04 $2,250
DEAN, WILLIAM
GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 SELF/PHYSICIAN 08/05/04 $2,250
SUSSMAN, JOHN
PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272 CAPITAL GROUP/MANAGING PARTNER 12/31/03 $2,000
HOBBY, JOHN
PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES/COMPUTER SCIENT 08/11/04 $1,500
HALLOWELL, A
KENNETT SQUARE, PA 19348 RETIRED 08/04/04 $1,500
HOBBY, JOHN
PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 08/11/04 $1,500
MCPECK, ROBERT
HOMOSASSA, FL 34448 08/27/04 $1,000
MILLAR, WILLIAM
FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046 HOUSEWIFE 08/09/04 $1,000
CHEN, MARGARET
NEW YORK, NY 10033 MOTHER CABRINI HIGH SCHOOL/TEACHER 08/19/04 $1,000
BERMAN, ED
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 SELF-EMPLOYED/INVESTOR 08/19/04 $1,000
ROSWELL, MARJORIE
BALTIMORE, MD 21218 UNIV OF MARYLAND/SPATIAL ANALYST 10/29/04 $1,000
ALBERT, LOUISE
BALTIMORE, MD 21204 09/20/04 $1,000
DITTMAR, JOHN
WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603 09/10/04 $1,000
ROSE, SAMUEL
WASHINGTON, DC 20015 08/09/04 $1,000
ALBERT, LOUISE
BALTIMORE, MD 21204 NONE/NONE 09/20/04 $1,000
WILSON, JANE
CONNERSVILLE, IN 47331 09/29/04 $1,000
ROSE, SAMUEL
WASHINGTON, DC 20015 GREENEBAUM & ROSE ASSOCIATES/REAL E 08/09/04 $1,000
MCPECK, ROBERT
HOMOSASSA, FL 34448 RETIRED 08/27/04 $1,000
COHEN, ARNOLD
MIAMI, FL 33160 RETIRED 08/09/04 $800
FISHER, JANET
NEW YORK, NY 10006 10/19/04 $700
KELCE, ROBERT
DENVER, CO 80231 RETIRED 09/10/04 $600
WINOGRAD, MARY
NEW YORK, NY 10128 08/19/04 $575
URICCHIO, MARY
HUNTINGTON, NY 11743 SELF-EMPLOYED/PHYSICIAN 08/04/04 $500
STEIN, ROBERT
LENOX, MA 01240 08/19/04 $500
SWEENEY, JEANNE
GLENDALE, OH 45246 08/04/04 $500
RUSCHA, EDWARD
VENICE, CA 90291 08/04/04 $500
NILES, MARY
HINGHAM, MA 02043 HOUSEWIFE 08/19/04 $500
O'CONNOR, ROBERT
VERO BEACH, FL 32963 08/27/04 $500
GUEST, CHRISTOPHER
SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 10/19/04 $500
MITHOFF, VIRGINIA
HOUSTON, TX 77019 N/A/RETIRED TEACHER 10/18/04 $500
FELDMAN, ROBERT
DALLAS, TX 75229 10/29/04 $500
HARWOOD, WILLIAM
YARMOUTH, ME 04096 VERRILL & DANA/ATTORNEY 03/05/04 $500
CONTI, MARGARET
DRYDEN, MI 48428 SELF EMPLOYED/BROKER 08/19/04 $500
BUTLER, ERIC
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 08/04/04 $500
KOTZIN, JOSEPH
LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 08/19/04 $500
LICHTENSTEIN, ALY
ALBERTSON, NY 11507 N/A/FULLTIME MOTHER 08/04/04 $500
HELLER, ALAN
LONG GROVE, IL 60047 08/19/04 $500
POST, ROBERT
HAVERFORD, PA 19041 09/21/04 $500
CAGIN, HARRY
CLEVELAND, OH 44124 RETIRED 10/13/04 $500
KOTZIN, JOSEPH
LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 NOT CURRENTLY EMPLOYED 08/19/04 $500
BUTLER, ERIC
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 UNITED HEALTH INTERNATIONAL/BUSINES 08/04/04 $500
DOUGLASS, CATHERINE
NEW YORK, NY 10028 INMOTION INC./LAWYER 10/01/04 $500
MANION OXLEY, DEBBY
MIDWAY, KY 40347 HOMEMAKER 10/27/04 $500
MARGOLIS, PAUL
WESTON, MA 02493 11/04/04 $500
RUSCHA, EDWARD
VENICE, CA 90291 SELF/ARTIST 08/04/04 $500
SHORE, DIANE
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 RETIRED 12/13/04 $500
ZIEGLER, RUTH
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211 HOUSEWIFE 11/04/04 $500
STEIN, ROBERT
LENOX, MA 01240 RETIRED 08/19/04 $500
SWEENEY, JEANNE
GLENDALE, OH 45246 HOMEMAKER 08/04/04 $500
PRESTWOOD, J
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 08/16/04 $450
PICK, THOMAS
NORTHFIELD, IL 60093 08/16/04 $400
NELSON, ESTA
RESTON, VA 20191 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY/MRS PROFES 08/09/04 $400
BUNTS, FRANK
NEW YORK, NY 10010 SELF/FOUNDATION DIRECTOR/ARTIST 08/17/04 $400
PICK, THOMAS
NORTHFIELD, IL 60093 RETIRED FINANCIAL ADVISOR 08/16/04 $400
MACARI, ANNE
LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE/WRITER/TEACHER 11/09/04 $400
SLOBODA, ALAN
LOMA LINDA, CA 92354 09/03/04 $400
LOFTUS, JAMES
MALIBU, CA 90265 COMMUNITY URGENT CARE/PHYSICIAN 09/10/04 $400
HOROWITZ, COLIN
MALIBU, CA 90265 RETIRED 08/23/04 $375
KELLOGG, RALPH
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109 RETIRED 08/05/04 $350

METHODOLOGY: The numbers on this page are based on contributions from individuals giving $200 or more, as reported to the Federal Election Commission.

And while the Brady Foundation may have hit on hard times in recent years, it appears they're experiencing a resurgence, as noted, from a variety of sources.

The NRA, by the way, has openly admitted receiving funds from the major gun manufacturers, which would seem to buttress the claim made that they are a lobbying group for the gun industry, and for individual gun owners perhaps not so much. Which might explain why even much of the NRA membership disagrees with its leadership on various issues.

If you truly have been around the planet and question and doubt everything, perhaps you should question why the NRA leadership would be so out of step, not only with gun owners in general--who evidently want to see SOME tightening of the regulations, but even much of their own leadership.

But it's been a long day, and perhaps we can resume this discussion tomorrow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No surprise their..... virginia mountainman Jan 2013 #1
What is the NRA going to do? Cary Jan 2013 #2
Which ban do you think will stop these shootings? Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #7
I don't know. Cary Jan 2013 #8
Well, as a friend told me once during an argument... Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #16
I didn't ask your friend. I asked you. Cary Jan 2013 #17
I assume you are talking about modern semi-automatic rifles that look similar ... spin Jan 2013 #18
Nice but none of it actually answers my question. Cary Jan 2013 #20
Please define "military style weapons" as you use it & I'll be delighted to answer that question. nt jody Jan 2013 #21
Sorry but I will not be playing that game with you or anyone else. Cary Jan 2013 #22
Sorry, I failed mind-reading. My guess is you don't have a definition for "military style weapons" jody Jan 2013 #23
That isn't an answer. Cary Jan 2013 #24
I answered your question. What are you trying to accomplish with your posts? nt jody Jan 2013 #25
Except you didn't answer the question. Cary Jan 2013 #28
they are not military style gejohnston Jan 2013 #29
You don't get it Cary Jan 2013 #30
I doubt you know anything about the gun laws of every other nation gejohnston Jan 2013 #31
I don't care about that doubt either. Cary Jan 2013 #32
not an NRA type, gejohnston Jan 2013 #33
But you're doing the NRA tactics. Cary Jan 2013 #34
You solve problems by finding the root problem and apply the solution gejohnston Jan 2013 #35
An epidemic of what? alabama_for_obama Jan 2013 #96
He means weapons that scare him holdencaufield Jan 2013 #50
A lot of "conservatives" are telling me this too. Cary Jan 2013 #55
Or maybe he means weapons like the one thucythucy Jan 2013 #77
Not bravery holdencaufield Jan 2013 #80
How will "knowledge" protect you thucythucy Jan 2013 #82
You understand the difference ... holdencaufield Jan 2013 #84
And you understand the difference between thucythucy Jan 2013 #88
You're being obtuse ... holdencaufield Jan 2013 #90
Good for you. thucythucy Jan 2013 #93
The Korean shop owners alabama_for_obama Jan 2013 #95
You asked me who (others?) needs these items. Ask THEM. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #38
You don't make the rules Eleanors38 Cary Jan 2013 #42
Sorry you are so upset, but when you propose bans Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #44
There is no such obligation Cary Jan 2013 #46
No, it won't. sylvi Jan 2013 #47
I have 28 years of litigation experience. Cary Jan 2013 #53
You propose bans, you provide the rationale. nt Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #98
I have provided my rationale several times. Cary Jan 2013 #99
The U.S. doesn't have a Dept. of Needs. GreenStormCloud Jan 2013 #54
Wow, I didn't know that. thucythucy Jan 2013 #78
"I know it's difficult to accept, but rights are not based on needs" Starboard Tack Jan 2013 #63
Where in the First does it say you have a right to electronic communication? Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #97
My proposal leaves plenty of guns adequate for SD, hunting and sport shooting. Starboard Tack Jan 2013 #109
Often forgotten is the stasis developed around civilian arms ownership. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #110
What absolute nonsense. Starboard Tack Jan 2013 #111
Wrong. Civilian gun ownership plateaued years ago with semi-autos. nt Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #113
OK, I think we're done Starboard Tack Jan 2013 #112
You were checked, Starboard. I guess you are angry. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #114
Anybody who shoots. krispos42 Jan 2013 #37
I don't accept that Cary Jan 2013 #41
Then I'm sorry to say you're living in a bubble krispos42 Jan 2013 #43
Reality is that there will very likely be some kind assault ban. Cary Jan 2013 #52
No, that's not my point of view krispos42 Jan 2013 #75
If you believe there is no real difference between these weapons then it must follow that... Cary Jan 2013 #56
we don't ban things based on "needs" gejohnston Jan 2013 #58
We enact laws based on balancing rights and common sense. Cary Jan 2013 #59
no one needs a 500 hp engine gejohnston Jan 2013 #60
So push to have 500 horsepower engines banned. Cary Jan 2013 #61
nobody needs it gejohnston Jan 2013 #62
Sorry bud but an engine isn't the same thing as a military style weapon. Cary Jan 2013 #64
I thought we were talking about saving lives gejohnston Jan 2013 #65
I have expressed my opinion that we should ban military style weapons and high capacity magazines. Cary Jan 2013 #66
help dealing with the root causes gejohnston Jan 2013 #67
And there's also a higher profit margin on military style weapons. Cary Jan 2013 #68
the profit is increased demand with what I think is a little price gouging on the side gejohnston Jan 2013 #69
This has nothing to do with "supply-side economics." Cary Jan 2013 #70
other than price gouging, how are they more profitable? gejohnston Jan 2013 #71
You tell me. Cary Jan 2013 #72
Walmart sold them gejohnston Jan 2013 #73
Or, you're okay with leaving things as they are. After all... krispos42 Jan 2013 #74
Do you accept sylvi Jan 2013 #48
I have reached a point where I believe we should ban military style weapons and high capacity mags. Cary Jan 2013 #57
if that is a human's response to mass shooing of 6 + 7 yr olds, pansypoo53219 Jan 2013 #3
+1000 HockeyMom Jan 2013 #5
obviously they are not human. must be zombies. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2013 #6
It wasn't a response to mass shooting of 6 + 7 yr olds sylvi Jan 2013 #49
Why am I not surprised that you refer to Democrats as "THEY"? Starboard Tack Jan 2013 #15
no surprise samsingh Jan 2013 #4
The NRA will use any comment by any politician who mentions banning or confiscating ... spin Jan 2013 #9
Well said. Pullo Jan 2013 #10
gunnuts anonymous - I was an nra member jimmy the one Jan 2013 #11
I'm a lifer with the NRA, membership was $500 back when it was 'gifted' to me. Now life mem Purveyor Jan 2013 #14
bunch of dumbasses. what do they know? nothing. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2013 #12
NRA approval 42%, disapproval 45% , PPP jimmy the one Jan 2013 #13
Amazing how quickly the stables are refilled. Hercules, Hercules, wherefore art thou! nt jody Jan 2013 #19
LOL! Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #39
That means about 349.9 million citizens did NOT join the NRA Trajan Jan 2013 #26
See #36. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #40
Why do I need to read #36? Trajan Jan 2013 #45
It also means that 90%+ of the firearms owners in the USA still aren't NRA members Xithras Jan 2013 #103
I'm sure the NRA will be publishing its membership directory soon.... rgbecker Jan 2013 #27
According to some reports the Brady Campaign sold a list of their members ... spin Jan 2013 #36
According to some reports thucythucy Jan 2013 #81
from the one foundation that pays their salaries and rent gejohnston Jan 2013 #83
Actually, no. thucythucy Jan 2013 #85
they get four million a year gejohnston Jan 2013 #87
It's late, and I'm getting a little bleary here. thucythucy Jan 2013 #92
that is because they told the FEC gejohnston Jan 2013 #94
"Urban and wealthy..." thucythucy Jan 2013 #100
I can relate in some ways gejohnston Jan 2013 #104
Just wanted to say thucythucy Jan 2013 #106
same here, gejohnston Jan 2013 #107
never underestimate the stupidity of the American Gun Nut...... bowens43 Jan 2013 #51
In a country of over $300 milion, that 100k Still Sensible Jan 2013 #76
Exactly. Huffington's loves to tabloid stories still_one Jan 2013 #102
Am I supposed to believe this? thucythucy Jan 2013 #79
Believe or not but the gun sale reports would seem to confirm... eom Purveyor Jan 2013 #86
Yeah, it confirms that a certain segment of our population thucythucy Jan 2013 #89
No argument from on that from me... eom Purveyor Jan 2013 #91
Surge? That amounts to .03% of the us population. What is the other still_one Jan 2013 #101
Obama supporters? HockeyMom Jan 2013 #105
Eleanors wrote about 'Arms' circa 1791 jimmy the one Jan 2013 #108
I have to say that the NRA has shown their evil side recently. hrmjustin Jan 2013 #115
Since I posted this...now they are 'claiming' over a quarter of a million new sign-ups? eom Purveyor Jan 2013 #116
They won't say how much they have lost. It makes me sick that people would join this group. hrmjustin Jan 2013 #117
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»NRA Membership Surges By ...»Reply #92