Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: M1 Carbine Imports Banned [View all]Straw Man
(6,925 posts)83. Float like a bulldozer, sting like wet Kleenex.
I think other countries regulate this quite effectively. I would look to their examples as a model.
Examples please, with specific reference to how they regulate collectors.
This has to do with guns in general. I don't see how adding more guns at this point to society makes anything better. I object on basic principle.
Translation: "Guns make me feel uncomfortable, so anything that places limitations on their ownership pleases me." Sorry -- not compelling and certainly far too vague a basis on which to base public policy.
The issue is militarism. I've made my objections to gun hoarding well known. I've varied on the numbers, but I definitely favor a progressive taxation on firearms ownership to discourage hoarding and the keeping of unreasonable amounts of firearms.
In a word, horseshit. This has nothing to do with militarism, and your constant attempts to link the two just speak to the weakness of your argument. Are you suggesting that militias are plotting the overthrow of the state with curios and relics? Please try to stay on the topic.
Damn right I'll second guess the ATF. I think it's my obligation as a citizen to have an opinion about government, to not be shunted to Mitt Romeny's quiet rooms.
So what is your policy recommendation? Abolish the C&R FFL? Make the collectors liquidate their collections? Go ahead and try to sell this as a reasonable measure. It should be very entertaining.
Perhaps you shouldn't be so quick to defer to "government" whenever asked for specifics on policy. Develop some opinions of your own rather than second-guessing existing policies.
I missed your initial. I was putting up Toons
I think that about says it all.
"There should not be a limit on how many firearms a law-abiding individual can own." Straw Man is in favor of unlimited guns. I guess I was kinda correct when I said that some people here are in favor of unlimited gun rights.
No -- I'm against limiting the private property rights of individuals without demonstrable need. That's hardly "unlimited gun rights." I think you'll see that if you give it more than a second's consideration.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Good news on the M1 Garands, but what a strange rationale for denying the M1 Carbines.
aikoaiko
Jan 2012
#2
Meanwhile, the ad for Big Five Sporting Goods in this morning's fishwrap is hawking...
slackmaster
Jan 2012
#3
Looks like the administration finally figured out that they had stepped in it.
Simo 1939_1940
Jan 2012
#4
You wouldn't understand this, but Simo 1939_1940 is supporting Democratics that way.
aikoaiko
Jan 2012
#6
How about people just leave the dang things at home. You guys could start tomorrow.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#23
I have never had a gun stolen in 30 years - and the threat has been steadily reduced for 20 years. n
hack89
Jan 2012
#40
Blame the victim for the crime. Where have we seen this vile shit before? n/t
PavePusher
Jan 2012
#41
So that was your single issue back then? -- Voting for candidate committed to bombing Vietnamese.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#12
I did not vote for the guy who promised to bomb people. Apparently, you liked that promise.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#18
All those beloved M1's would be a gold mine considering the prices of originals these days.
ileus
Jan 2012
#7
Detachable-magazine-fed rifles are not illegal in the US, nor have they ever been...
krispos42
Jan 2012
#8
I'm guessing he's never heard of the civilian marksmanship program, ever.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2012
#103
Yes, because thugs are really looking around for 3 foot long 10lb battle rifles.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2012
#102
And how exactly do you propose that paranoid people be prevented from owning a dozen guns?
Jean V. Dubois
Jan 2012
#70