Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: Agree or Disagree? [View all]

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
36. What happened to the 50% or so of the Gungeon posters who are virulently anti-gun?
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:33 AM
Feb 2013

The OP excerpt could have been lifted, almost verbatim, from some threads here in the Gun Kontrol forum.

I just don't see those posters agreeing with Dorner here.

Why is that?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Agree or Disagree? [View all] Common Sense Party Feb 2013 OP
Can you explain to me what this line means? rdharma Feb 2013 #1
Bushmaster, among others, gejohnston Feb 2013 #3
Oh , yes! My crazy 1%er uncle sent me a chain e-mail on them! rdharma Feb 2013 #4
AFAIK, Soros never owned stock in it gejohnston Feb 2013 #5
The rumor you uncle probably heard was based on Marlin........ rdharma Feb 2013 #7
AR IIRC, is a trademark name for Colt only, gejohnston Feb 2013 #8
AR-15 was the murder weapon at the Sandy Hook Massacre! rdharma Feb 2013 #11
I didn't say it wasn't gejohnston Feb 2013 #18
I didn't say it wasn't...... rdharma Feb 2013 #25
you meant model number and trademarks gejohnston Feb 2013 #26
precision is cool...... rdharma Feb 2013 #28
after a few beers, I do gejohnston Feb 2013 #30
Complete and total bullshit rl6214 Feb 2013 #2
This is the kind of loony shit that will pipoman Feb 2013 #6
Disagree discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2013 #9
Disagree. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #10
Nobody's ever really explained to me why modern rifles are so dangerous -- rdharma Feb 2013 #13
I note the distinct lack of an explanation. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #15
Outrage and fuzzy generalities do not substitute for facts....... rdharma Feb 2013 #27
How so? Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #29
...some mythical killing advantage rdharma Feb 2013 #37
Still no answer, Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #39
They're being singled out because they have a frightening appearance rdharma Feb 2013 #40
I decline to answer that question, Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #44
You have no facts on your side. rdharma Feb 2013 #47
That's five replies without an answer. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #49
Thompson submachine gun iiibbb Feb 2013 #48
I think I'll go out and buy a fully auto Thompson! rdharma Feb 2013 #51
The technology existed iiibbb Feb 2013 #52
Nice straw man! rdharma Feb 2013 #53
You seem to have a one post memory iiibbb Feb 2013 #54
Review your own conversation... rdharma Feb 2013 #55
Those "modern weapons" are no different from those a century ago ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #31
So tell us, why now is there such a call for banning. rdharma Feb 2013 #38
Detachable magazine semiautomatic weapons have been around since the turn of the century ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #42
The Remington Model 8 (the first semi-auto rifle capable Eleanors38 Feb 2013 #45
I'm familiar with the Remington Model 8 rdharma Feb 2013 #50
Only to show that this century-plus old firearm shows the technology... Eleanors38 Feb 2013 #58
Just 5 years shy of it's 100th birthday is the Browning BAR. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #56
Yup! Can you buy a BAR legally from a private party......... rdharma Feb 2013 #57
If it's semi auto no paperwork is required. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #59
Then it's NOT a BAR....... rdharma Feb 2013 #63
yes iiibbb Feb 2013 #60
Not a real BAR! rdharma Feb 2013 #61
semi auto version of century old tech iiibbb Feb 2013 #62
Keep Diggin'! rdharma Feb 2013 #64
Hard to converse with someone who can't remember the claims iiibbb Feb 2013 #65
BTW - This "BS-AR" M1918-A3 rdharma Feb 2013 #66
Why do the police need these things? iiibbb Feb 2013 #12
Why do the police need these things? rdharma Feb 2013 #14
they really need full auto? iiibbb Feb 2013 #16
Which PDs have full autos? rdharma Feb 2013 #22
Any that get surplus rifles and many are buying them new ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #32
I know of some SWAT entry teams who have MP-5s or M4s..... rdharma Feb 2013 #33
Yes we are ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #34
The US Army was transferring M-16 variants to PDs around the US. rdharma Feb 2013 #35
Same logic as "only prostitutes need condoms" iiibbb Feb 2013 #17
Nice reductio ad absurdum....... rdharma Feb 2013 #23
All of the cops chasing Dorner have 30-round magazines kudzu22 Feb 2013 #20
Why are you asking ME that? rdharma Feb 2013 #24
By their actions so far they will kill, or wound, 29 before they catch him. oneshooter Feb 2013 #43
disagree and doesn't his actions prove contradictory to his own manifesto? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2013 #19
Dorner's screed reads like the ranting of a genuine paranoid schizophrenic. slackmaster Feb 2013 #21
What happened to the 50% or so of the Gungeon posters who are virulently anti-gun? Common Sense Party Feb 2013 #36
I'm not sure, but after all the years I've been on DU I'm beginning to suspect that some of them... slackmaster Feb 2013 #41
And D. Klebold & his Dad thought CCW should be opposed. Eleanors38 Feb 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Agree or Disagree?»Reply #36