Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: Agree or Disagree? [View all]
 

iiibbb

(1,448 posts)
65. Hard to converse with someone who can't remember the claims
Tue Feb 12, 2013, 07:38 AM
Feb 2013

they've made, posts they've made, or won't pick up on other points.

It is very easy to win debates you've apparently so narrowly defined and poorly framed.

Whatever

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Agree or Disagree? [View all] Common Sense Party Feb 2013 OP
Can you explain to me what this line means? rdharma Feb 2013 #1
Bushmaster, among others, gejohnston Feb 2013 #3
Oh , yes! My crazy 1%er uncle sent me a chain e-mail on them! rdharma Feb 2013 #4
AFAIK, Soros never owned stock in it gejohnston Feb 2013 #5
The rumor you uncle probably heard was based on Marlin........ rdharma Feb 2013 #7
AR IIRC, is a trademark name for Colt only, gejohnston Feb 2013 #8
AR-15 was the murder weapon at the Sandy Hook Massacre! rdharma Feb 2013 #11
I didn't say it wasn't gejohnston Feb 2013 #18
I didn't say it wasn't...... rdharma Feb 2013 #25
you meant model number and trademarks gejohnston Feb 2013 #26
precision is cool...... rdharma Feb 2013 #28
after a few beers, I do gejohnston Feb 2013 #30
Complete and total bullshit rl6214 Feb 2013 #2
This is the kind of loony shit that will pipoman Feb 2013 #6
Disagree discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2013 #9
Disagree. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #10
Nobody's ever really explained to me why modern rifles are so dangerous -- rdharma Feb 2013 #13
I note the distinct lack of an explanation. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #15
Outrage and fuzzy generalities do not substitute for facts....... rdharma Feb 2013 #27
How so? Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #29
...some mythical killing advantage rdharma Feb 2013 #37
Still no answer, Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #39
They're being singled out because they have a frightening appearance rdharma Feb 2013 #40
I decline to answer that question, Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #44
You have no facts on your side. rdharma Feb 2013 #47
That's five replies without an answer. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #49
Thompson submachine gun iiibbb Feb 2013 #48
I think I'll go out and buy a fully auto Thompson! rdharma Feb 2013 #51
The technology existed iiibbb Feb 2013 #52
Nice straw man! rdharma Feb 2013 #53
You seem to have a one post memory iiibbb Feb 2013 #54
Review your own conversation... rdharma Feb 2013 #55
Those "modern weapons" are no different from those a century ago ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #31
So tell us, why now is there such a call for banning. rdharma Feb 2013 #38
Detachable magazine semiautomatic weapons have been around since the turn of the century ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #42
The Remington Model 8 (the first semi-auto rifle capable Eleanors38 Feb 2013 #45
I'm familiar with the Remington Model 8 rdharma Feb 2013 #50
Only to show that this century-plus old firearm shows the technology... Eleanors38 Feb 2013 #58
Just 5 years shy of it's 100th birthday is the Browning BAR. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #56
Yup! Can you buy a BAR legally from a private party......... rdharma Feb 2013 #57
If it's semi auto no paperwork is required. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #59
Then it's NOT a BAR....... rdharma Feb 2013 #63
yes iiibbb Feb 2013 #60
Not a real BAR! rdharma Feb 2013 #61
semi auto version of century old tech iiibbb Feb 2013 #62
Keep Diggin'! rdharma Feb 2013 #64
Hard to converse with someone who can't remember the claims iiibbb Feb 2013 #65
BTW - This "BS-AR" M1918-A3 rdharma Feb 2013 #66
Why do the police need these things? iiibbb Feb 2013 #12
Why do the police need these things? rdharma Feb 2013 #14
they really need full auto? iiibbb Feb 2013 #16
Which PDs have full autos? rdharma Feb 2013 #22
Any that get surplus rifles and many are buying them new ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #32
I know of some SWAT entry teams who have MP-5s or M4s..... rdharma Feb 2013 #33
Yes we are ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #34
The US Army was transferring M-16 variants to PDs around the US. rdharma Feb 2013 #35
Same logic as "only prostitutes need condoms" iiibbb Feb 2013 #17
Nice reductio ad absurdum....... rdharma Feb 2013 #23
All of the cops chasing Dorner have 30-round magazines kudzu22 Feb 2013 #20
Why are you asking ME that? rdharma Feb 2013 #24
By their actions so far they will kill, or wound, 29 before they catch him. oneshooter Feb 2013 #43
disagree and doesn't his actions prove contradictory to his own manifesto? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2013 #19
Dorner's screed reads like the ranting of a genuine paranoid schizophrenic. slackmaster Feb 2013 #21
What happened to the 50% or so of the Gungeon posters who are virulently anti-gun? Common Sense Party Feb 2013 #36
I'm not sure, but after all the years I've been on DU I'm beginning to suspect that some of them... slackmaster Feb 2013 #41
And D. Klebold & his Dad thought CCW should be opposed. Eleanors38 Feb 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Agree or Disagree?»Reply #65